Skip to main content
. 2020 May 4;35(7):1987–1996. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-05790-6

Table 1.

Descriptive and Statistical Test Results of Visibility, Staff Interviews, and Surveys

Approach Clinic A Clinic S Comparison between the two clinics (t test)
Mean difference (p value) 95% CI [LL, UL]*
Workstation visibility
  Total number of workstations (N) 20 52
  Mean number of visible other workstations 5.7 27.5
  Mean ratio of workstation visibility 28.6% 53.0% − 24.4 (p < 0.001) [− 35.3, − 13.5]
Interviews
  Participants 11 25§
Staff survey
  Available staff members during the visits 24 63
  Participants (N) 20 37
  Response rate 83% 59%
  Awareness (4 items): Mean (SD) 4.15 (0.57) 4.34 (0.59) − 0.19 (p = 0.25) [− 0.51, 0.14]
  Communication concerns (4 items): Mean (SD) 3.20 (0.84) 2.29 (0.81) 0.91 (p < 0.001) [0.46, 1.37]

* LL and UL indicate the lower-level limit and upper-level limit of a confidence interval, respectively

† The number of degrees of freedom was adjusted since Levene’s Test for Equality of Variances was statistically significant

‡ 3 providers, 2 licensed practical nurses, 1 registered nurse, 1 behavioral health specialist, 1 receptionist, 2 administrative staff, and 1 interpreter

§ 2 providers, 9 licensed practical nurses, 1 registered nurse, 2 care coordinators, 1 social worker, 1 behavioral health specialist, 2 administrative staff, 4 clinical assistants, 2 patient appointment coordinators, and 1 phone triage nurse

Survey items used a 5-point Likert scale (strongly disagree to strongly agree). A higher score indicated better awareness and higher concerns for talking about patients