Skip to main content
. 2020 May 27;12(6):1379. doi: 10.3390/cancers12061379

Table 5.

Univariate and multivariate Cox Regression analysis.

Univariate Analysis Multivariate Analysis
PFS OS PFS OS
HR (95% CI) p-Value HR (95% CI) p-Value HR (95% CI) p-Value HR (95% CI) p-Value
Gender (Male vs. Female) 1.0 (0.8–1.4) 0.986 0.9 (0.7–1.2) 0.411 - - - -
Histology (Colon/Sigmoid vs. Rectum) 1.2 (0.9–1.6) 0.267 1.2 (0.9–1.7) 0.172 - - - -
PS ECOG (≥2 vs. 0–1) 2.6 (1.6–4.2) <0.001 4.4 (2.8–6.9) <0.001 1.6 (1.0–2.6) 0.04 3.7 (2.4–5.9) <0.001
Age (≥70 vs. <70) 1.1 (0.8–1.4) 0.652 1.3 (1.0–1.8) 0.06 - - - -
Grade (High vs. Low) 1.4 (0.6–3.4) 0.493 4.4 (1.8–11.0) 0.001 - - 1.8 (0.7–5.1) <0.001
KRAS 1.0 (0.8–1.4) 0.787 1.2 (0.8–1.6) 0.362 - - - -
TLR2 196-to-174 del (homozygous mutant vs. others) 2.1 (1.2–3.9) 0.016 3.7 (2.4–5.9) <0.001 2.2 (1.2–4.1) 0.013 2.1 (1.3–3.4) 0.003
TLR4-Asp299Gly (homozygous mutant vs. others) 1.2 (0.9–1.7) 0.259 2.3 (1.7–3.3) <0.001 - - 1.4 (1.0–1.9) 0.095
TLR4-Thr399Ile (homozygous mutant vs. others) 1.2 (0.9–1.7) 0.259 2.3 (1.7–3.3) <0.001 - - 1.4 (1.0–1.9) 0.095
TLR9-T1237C (homozygous mutant vs. others) 1.0 (0.7–1.4) 0.928 1.7 (1.3–2.3) <0.001 - - 1.1 (0.8–1.6) 0.336
TLR9-T1486C (homozygous mutant vs. others) 1.0 (0.7–1.4) 0.928 1.7 (1.3–2.3) <0.001 - - 1.1 (0.8–1.6) 0.336
TaqI (homozygous mutant vs. others) 1.2 (0.9–1.2) 0.783 2.2 (1.8–2.7) <0.001 - - 1.3 (1.0–1.6) 0.029
ApaI (homozygous mutant vs. others) 1.1 (0.9–1.3) 0.46 2.6 (2.1–3.1) <0.001 - - 1.6 (1.3–2.0) <0.001
FokI (homozygous mutant vs. others) 1.1 (0.9–1.2) 0.768 2.2 (1.9–2.6) <0.001 - - 1.4 (1.1–1.8) 0.005
BsmI (homozygous mutant vs. others) 0.1 (0.9–1.3) 0.616 1.7 1.4–2.2) <0.001 - - 1.0 (0.7–1.6) 0.644