Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 24;12(6):1685. doi: 10.3390/cancers12061685

Table 1.

Overview of patients’ characteristics according to TMB values.

Variation Total TMB < 10 TMB > 10
N = 417 N = 260 (62.35%) N = 157 (37.65%)
Age Median 66 66 66
Mean (±SD) 65.0 (11.8) 64.7 (12.5) 65.7 (10.5)
Range 21–92 21–92 93–90
<65 years 199 (47.72%) 126 (48.46%) 73 (46.50%)
≥65 years 218 (52.28%) 134 (51.54%) 84 (53.50%)
Sex Female 177 (42.45%) 140 (53.85%) 100 (63.69%)
Male 240 (57.55%) 120 (46.15%) 57 (36.31%)
Histology Adenocarcinoma 308 (73.86%) 201 (77.31%) 107 (68.15%)
Squamous 33 (7.91%) 14 (5.38%) 19 (12.10%)
Adeno-squamous 1 (0.24%) 1 (0.38%)
Large-cell neuroendocrine 2 (0.48%) 2 (1.27%)
SCLC 4 (0.96%) 4 (1.54%)
NOS 69 (16.55%) 40 (15.38%) 29 (18.47%)
EGFR Status Mutant 62 (14.87%) 47 (18.08%) 15 (9.55%)
Wild type 355 (85.13%) 213 (81.92%) 142 (90.45%)
targetable EGFR mutation 41 (66.13%) 33 (12.69%) 8 (5.10%)
targetable EGFR plus resistance mutation T790M 3 (4.84%) 3 (1.15%)
EGFR exon 20 insertion 6 (9.68%) 6 (2.31%)
other / variant of unknown significance 12 (19.35%) 5 (1.92%) 7 (4.46%)
BRAF Status Mutant 36 (8.63%) 20 (7.69%) 16 (10.19%)
Wild type 381 (91.37%) 240 (92.31%) 141 (89.81%)
V600E / class I * 9 (25.00%) 8 (3.08%) 1 (0.64%)
non-V600E / class II * 11 (30.56%) 5 (1.92%) 6 (3.82%)
non-V600E / class III * 5 (13.89%) 3 (1.15%) 2 (1.27%)
other mutation / variant of unknown significance 11 (30.56%) 4 (1.54%) 7 (4.46%)
Gene Fusions Mutant 41 (9.83%) 32 (12.31%) 9 (5.73%)
Wild type 368 (88.25%) 223 (85.77%) 145 (92.36%)
n.d. 8 (1.92%) 5 (1.92%) 3 (1.91%)
ALK translocation 15 (36.59%) 14 (5.38%) 1 (0.64%)
ROS1 translocation 2 (4.88%) 1 (0.38%) 1 (0.64%)
RET translocation 3 (7.32%) 3 (1.15%)
other fusions / translocation of unknown significance 21 (51.22%) 14 (5.38%) 7 (4.46%)
PD-L1 TPS <1% 123 (29.50%) 79 (30.38%) 44 (28.03%)
≥1% and <5% 50 (11.99%) 26 (10.00%) 24 (15.29%)
≥5% and <50% 79 (18.94%) 55 (21.15%) 24 (15.29%)
≥50% 99 (23.74%) 53 (20.38%) 46 (29.30%)
n.d. 66 (15.83%) 47 (18.08%) 19 (12.10%)

* BRAF mutations were classified based on Yao et al. [26].