Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 15;31(13):1392–1402. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E19-09-0520

TABLE 2:

Summary of results from the confocal microscopy screen for a subset of 21 randomly selected genes.

Confocal screen results
Gene name Number of nuclei Mean EFC ratio Standard error Statistically significant? Hit in the high-throughput screen?
MTA2 176 4.62 0.15 Yes Yes
TAF7 255 5.07 0.10 Yes Yes
FOXP1 153 5.19 0.16 Yes Yes
DIDO1 146 5.14 0.15 Yes Yes
SUZ12 164 5.19 0.15 Yes Yes
TP53 235 5.35 0.13 Yes Yes
ARID4A 176 6.01 0.20 Yes Yes
RAD54L2 165 5.49 0.13 Yes Yes
CXXC1 199 5.93 0.17 Yes Yes
MAP3K7 137 5.97 0.15 No Yes
FBL 246 6.26 0.13 No No
RAD51 188 6.33 0.16 No No
WSB2 492 6.38 0.11 No Yes
HIST1H1T 209 6.31 0.15 No Yes
HIST1H3G 210 6.80 0.18 No Yes
ZRANB3 209 6.63 0.14 No Yes
LEO1 202 6.85 0.14 No No
SCRAM 467 6.93 0.11 N/A N/A
GADD45A 148 7.09 0.16 No No
SMARCB1 158 7.48 0.21 No No
INO80B 124 7.79 0.23 No Yes

Statistical significance of gene depletion EFC ratios, relative to the scrambled siRNA control, was determined by the two-tailed Bonferroni-corrected nonparametric Dunn’s test for p < 0.05.