Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 22;12(6):1861. doi: 10.3390/nu12061861

Table 3.

Descriptive statistics for scales used in the questionnaire to assess perceptions of the nutrition professional or social media influencers post; trustworthiness of post content, authenticity of post content, and perceived message appeals

Nutrition Professional Social Media Influencer p
Trustworthiness 3.8 (3.2, 4.2) 3.4 (3.0, 4.0) 0.001
Authenticity 4 (3.33, 5.0) 4 (3.0, 4.33) 0.016
Perceived message appeal
Affiliation 4.0 (4.0, 5.0) 5.0 (4.0, 5.0) <0.001
Hope 4.0 (4.0, 5.0) 4.0 (4.0, 5.0) 0.735
Humour 4.0 (3.0, 4.0) 4.0 (3.0, 5.0) 0.081
Heroism 4.0 (4.0, 5.0) 4.0 (3.0, 5.0) <0.001
Ease/convenience 3.0 (2.0, 4.0) 3.0 (2.0, 4.0) 0.109
Guilt/shame 1.0 (1.0, 3.0) 1.0 (1.0, 2.0) 0.001
Sorrow 1.0 (1.0, 2.0) 1.0 (1.0, 2.0) 0.377
Fear 1.0 (1.0, 2.0) 1.0 (1.0, 2.0) 0.415

Significance at p < 0.05 using the Wilcoxon signed rank test. Reported as median score (25th, 75th percentile) of a five-point Likert scale ranging from 1—‘strongly disagree’, to 5—‘strongly agree’.