Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 1;10(6):1087. doi: 10.3390/nano10061087

Table 1.

Results of longitudinal analysis on tumor zize. Tumor size was analyzed as a function of log(time), log(time)2, sex, age at irradiation, tumor volume at irradiation, radiation energy and nanoparticle size, with sex = M, energy = 90 kVp, and size = smallest being the reference level. A positive (negative) estimate indicates that a larger (smaller) value of the parameter is associated with a larger tumor size than the reference level. A p-value < 0.05 is considered statistically significant. Results show that every variable had a statistically significant effect on the tumor size, although the middle and smallest sizes were not different by a statistically significant amount.

Parameter Estimates for Response Model
Parameter Estimate Standard Error p Value
Intercept −0.8984 0.1490 <0.0001
Log(time) −1.5387 0.1143 <0.0001
Log(time)2 0.6422 0.0446 <0.0001
Sex F 0.3136 0.1465 0.0323
Sex M 0 - -
Age at Irradiation −0.2552 0.0545 <0.0001
Tumor Volume at Irradiation 0.3751 0.0814 <0.0001
Energy 250 kVp 0.8810 0.2854 0.0020
Energy 350 kVp 1.8928 0.2220 <0.0001
Energy 90 kVp 0 - -
Size Middle 0.1599 0.1678 0.3407
Size Largest 0.6183 0.1864 0.0009
Size Smallest 0 - -