Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 10;9(6):766. doi: 10.3390/foods9060766

Table 1.

In vitro total phenolic content, antiradical and bacterial inhibition of GTWE and chitosan coatings.

Treatment 1 TPHC
(mg GAE/g)
FRSA (%) Antimicrobial Assay (%)
S. aureus L. innocua E. coli S. typhimurium
GTWE 582.7 ± 24.0 a 90.7 ± 1.0 a 86.8 ± 0.2 c 95.1 ± 0.22 c 94.6 ± 0.10 d 91.7 ± 0.17 c
ChC—0% 0.03 ± 0.01 d 0.16 ± 0.01 c 58.6 ± 1.2 d 64.1 ± 1.3 e 49.7 ± 0.11 e 82.2 ± 1.3 d
ChC—0.1% 0.67 ± 0.05 c 71.9 ± 2.2 b 86.6 ± 0.10 c 94.9 ± 0.29 d 96.1 ± 0.06 c 93.1 ± 0.13 c
ChC—0.5% 3.3 ± 0.23 b 92.5 ± 1.1 a 96.6 ± 0.10 b 97.6 ± 0.22 b 97.7 ± 0.17 b 97.4 ± 0.19 b
Asc ac - 94.0 ± 2.5 a - - - -
Gentamicin - - 99.2 ± 0.10 a 99.1 ± 0.11 a 99.5 ± 0.06 a 99.5 ± 0.06 a

1 Values correspond to mean ± standard deviation (n = 6 per treatment). GTWE, green tea water extract; ChC—0%, chitosan without GTWE; ChC—0.1%, chitosan with 0.1% of GTWE; ChC—0.5%, chitosan with 0.5% of GTWE. TPHC, total phenolic content; FRSA, free radical scavenging activity; Asc ac, ascorbic acid. Both standards were tested at 25 µg/mL. Different superscripts (a–e) within a column indicate significant differences among treatments (p < 0.05).