Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 11;20:217. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02136-y

Table 3.

Change in students’ PPOS-D12 scores during the study

All participants completing both surveys (n = 306) Allocated to active intervention (n = 150) Allocated to sham intervention (n = 156) Significance level*
Increase in mean PPOS-D12 score (SD) 0.27 (0.44) 0.23 (0.41) 0.32 (0.47) p = 0.426

* For difference between active and sham intervention groups, after adjustment for different baseline PPOS-D12 scores using ANCOVA