Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 11;13:89. doi: 10.1186/s13045-020-00919-w

Table 2.

Statistical analysis on HMCLs treated with BVDV

Mean ± SD % of dead cells
BVDV vs. CNT
p value
JJN3 24 h 18.5 ± 2.5% vs. 5.3 ± 1% 0.00005
48 h 44.2 ± 9.8% vs. 11.3 ± 1.5% 0.0002
72 h 54.3 ± 12.8% vs. 21.5 ± 1.9% 0.002
OPM2 24 h 28 ± 1% vs. 9 ± 1.4% < 0.00001
48 h 48 ± 5.6% vs. 13 ± 2.7% 0.00002
72 h 58 ± 1.7% vs. 22 ± 1.8% < 0.00001
MM1.S 24 h 9 ± 1.8% vs. 4 ± 1.7% 0.012
48 h 12 ± %3 vs. 5 ± 1.2% 0.005
72 h 20 ± 1.7% vs. 4 ± 0.5% < 0.00001
NCI-H929 24 h 10 ± 0.01 vs. 8 ± 0.01 0.16553
48 h 26 ± 2.6% vs. 10 ± 1.2% 0.00004
72 h 76 ± 2.5% vs. 10.5 ± 0.5% < 0.00001

Abbreviations: BVDV bovine viral diarrhea virus, CNT control (untreated cells), SD standard deviation