Table 6.
Comparative results of mutation patterns reported from different parts of world
| Study/authors | Country | Number of patients (n) | InhA mutation | KatG mutation | Both |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C. Alagappan et al. (2018) | India | 1821 | 528 (29) | 1297 (71) | - |
| J. Isakova et al. (2018) | Russia | 114 | 8 (7) | 104 (91.2) | - |
| Z. Tavakkoli, A. Nazem et al. (2018) | Brazil | 116 | 20 (17.24) | 96 (82.6) | - |
| V. R. Bollela et al. (2016) | Brazil | 22 | 9 (40.9) | 12 (54.5) | 1 (4.5) |
| Mozambique | 38 | 4 (10.5) | 32 (84.2) | 2 (4.2) | |
| Abraham J. Nieshaus et al. (2015) | South Africa | 603 | 99 (16.41) | 435 (72.13) | 69 (11.44) |
| T. Jagieiski et al. (2015) | Poland | 54 | 2 (3.7) | 46 (88.2) | 6 (11.1) |
| N. Shubladze et al. (2013) | Georgia | 678 | 143 (22.6) | 535 (84.3) | - |
| T. Luo et al. (2009) | China | 242 | 24 (9.9) | 216 (89.3) | 02 (0.8) |
| Elis R Dalla Costa et al. (2009) | South America | 224 | 43 (20) | 181 (80) | - |
| Present study (2019) | India | 298 | 59 (19.7) | 221 (74.1) | 18 (6) |
Patterns observed in the present study are almost similar to that reported by others