Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 7;15:1077–1084. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S257304

Table 1.

Differences in Outcome Measures Among Groups in the Study Population (n=753)

At Low Risk of Falling
(EFST = 0–1)
(n=378)
At Moderate Risk of Falling
(EFST = 2–3)
(n=247)
At High Risk of Falling
(EFST = 4–5)
(n=128)
P-values
4MGS (m/s) 0.89 ± 0.34 0.57 ± 0.38 0.37 ± 0.20 <0.001**
4MGS ≤ 0.8 m/s 152 (40.21) 172 (69.64) 120 (93.75) <0.001*
UST (s) 15.70 ± 15.04 8.39 ± 10.37 3.17 ± 2.87 <0.001**
Pathological UST 290 (76.72) 224 (90.69) 127 (99.22) <0.001*
Falls in the previous year
 0 322 (85.19) 58 (23.48) 0 (0.00) <0.001*
 1 52 (13.76) 107 (43.32) 61 (47.66) <0.001*
 ≥2 4 (1.06) 82 (33.20) 67 (52.34) <0.001*
Vertebral fragility fractures 42 (11.11) 65 (26.32) 67 (52.34) <0.001*
Hip fragility fractures 6 (1.59) 25 (10.12) 36 (28.13) <0.001*
NVNH fractures 19 (5.03) 14 (5.67) 14 (10.94) <0.001*

Notes: Values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation for continuous data and counts (percentages) for categorical data. P-values are considered significant when P is less than 0.05. *Pearson’s Chi-squared test; **Kruskal–Wallis test.

Abbreviations: EFST, Elderly Fall Screening Test; 4MGS, 4-meter gait speed; UST, unipedal stance test; NVNH, non-vertebral and non-hip.