Skip to main content
editorial
. 2020 Jun;9(3):977–980. doi: 10.21037/tau-20-842

Table 1. Trials and studies investigating the effect of NAC on tumour downstaging (pCR and downstaging) and outcomes (progression free survival and overall survival) in patients with MIBC.

Clinical study (design) N Original stage Treatments pDS rate pCR rate Effect of pDS on OS
SWOG (phase 3) (4) 317 T2-T4a MVAC vs. RC 38% vs. 15% OS for patient with pCR was 85%
Health and Research Informatics System, Florida (retrospective) (7) 1,113 T1-T4/N0-3/M0-1 dd-MVAC vs. GC 52.2% vs. 41.3% 41.3% vs. 24.5%
MSKCC (phase 2) (8) 49 T2-T4aN0M0 dd-GC 15% pDS was associated with better RFS and OS
RISC and NCDB (retrospective) (9) 181 (RISC) and 2,010 (NCDB) T2-4N0M0 NAC 33% and 35% 20% and 15% pDS was associated with better OS
Nordic Trials 1 and 2 (retrospective) (10) 449 T2-T4aNxM0, pT4aN0-N+M0 NAC vs. RC 22.7% vs. 12.5% pCR was associated with better OS in NAC group
European and American study (retrospective) (11) 304 cN1-3 MVAC or GC 48% (pN0) OS was associated with pN0 and negative margins
Population-based study (retrospective) (12) 659 cN1 and cN2/3 NAC vs. RC 39% (cN1) and 27% (cN2/3) pDS was associated with better OS

pDS, pathologic downstaging; pCR, pathologic complete response; SWOG, Southwest Oncology Group; MVAC, Methotrexate, Vinblastine, Doxorubicin and Cisplatin; RC, radical cystectomy; dd-MAVAC, dose dense MVAC; GC, Gemcitabine Cisplatin; MSKCC, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center; dd-GC, dese dense Gemcitabine Cisplatin; RISC, Retrospective International Study of Cancers of the Urothelial Tract; NCDB, National Cancer Database; NAC, neoadjuvant chemotherapy.