Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun;9(3):1394–1404. doi: 10.21037/tau.2020.03.39

Table 1. Main characters of studies included in this meta-analysis.

First author Year Country Ethnicity Control source Sample size cases/controls Cases Controls Genotype methods
LL LS SS LL LS SS
Janssen et al. 2009 Netherlands Caucasian HB 89/92 27 43 19 27 41 24 PCR-RFLP
Ozbek et al. 2009 Turkey Caucasian PB 69/69 11 21 37 12 37 20 PCR-RFLP
Safarinejad et al. 2009 Iran Caucasian PB 82/82 24 29 29 35 30 17 PCR-RFLP
Luo et al. 2011 China Asian HB 119/90 24 34 61 25 31 34 PCR-RFLP
Zuccarello et al. 2012 Italy Caucasian PB 89/100 22 49 18 33 51 16 PCR-RFLP
Huang et al. 2016 China Asian PB 114/101 18 61 35 22 48 31 PCR-RFLP
Salem et al. 2017 Egypt African HB 60/20 16 25 19 10 8 2 PCR-RFLP
Kham et al. 2018 Pakistan Asian PB 271/152 108 97 66 30 72 50 PCR-RFLP

HB, hospital based; PB, population based; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; RFLP, restriction fragment length polymorphism.