Skip to main content
. 2020 May 7;10(2):36. doi: 10.3390/jpm10020036

Table 2.

Summary of results from all interventions and parameters measured.

Calf Circumference EV (mL) P Versus. <35 cm PV (cm/s) P Versus. <35 cm TAMEAN (cm/s) P Versus.
<35 cm
<35 cm
Baseline
18.05 ± 7.7 17.16 ± 3.8 3.99 ± 0.9
<35 cm
Voluntary
Contraction
27.63 ± 7.5 P = 0.0280 70.28 ± 12.7 P < 0.0001 5.98 ± 1.2 P < 0.0088
<35 cm
NUIG
21.46 ± 6.7 P = 0.8166 54.55 ± 23.7 P = 0.0012 5.30 ± 1.01 P = 0.2560
<35 cm
GekoTM
17.55 ± 3.7 P = 0.9994 61.72 ± 22.9 P < 0.0001 4.66 ± 2.2 P = 0.8095
>35 cm
Baseline
18.8 ± 9.1 18.21 ± 5.1 3.42 ± 1.1
>35 cm
Voluntary
Contraction
33.93 ± 10.6 P = 0.0119 81.60 ± 13.5 P < 0.0001 6.05 ± 1.4 P = 0.0004
>35 cm
NUIG
24.41 ± 9.4 P = 0.7355 66.45 ± 19.2 P < 0.0001 4.57 ± 1.4 P = 0.3388
>35 cm
GekoTM
28.74 ± 11.7 P = 0.4444 40.04 ± 14.6 P = 0.0627 4.06 ± 1.8 P = 0.8590

Ejected volume (EV), peak venous velocity (PV), and timed average velocity (TAMEAN) represented in subgroups for 12-s measurement windows. P-value versus baseline for intervention subgroup. P-value versus mean ± standard deviation.