Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 25;12(6):419. doi: 10.3390/toxins12060419

Table 1.

Comparison of emetogenic potentials upon intraperitoneal injection (IP) and oral exposure to diacetoxyscirpenol (DAS).

Exposure Route Dose (mg/kg bw) Incidence (Responding/Tested) Latency (min) A,B Duration (min) A,B Retch (Times) Vomit (Times) Total (Times)
IP 0 0/5 - - 0 ± 0 0 ± 0 0 ± 0
0.05 0/5 - - 0 ± 0 0 ± 0 0 ± 0
0.1 0/5 - - 0 ± 0 0 ± 0 0 ± 0
0.25 1/5 42 ± 0 a 3 ± 0 a 7 ± 7 2 ± 2 9 ± 9
0.5* 5/5 27 ± 4 a 120 ± 13 b 122 ± 11 15 ± 8 137 ± 19
1* 5/5 18 ± 5 a 189 ± 19 b 181 ± 31 25 ± 11 206 ± 42
Oral 0 0/5 - - 0 ± 0 0 ± 0 0 ± 0
0.01 0/5 - - 0 ± 0 0 ± 0 0 ± 0
0.025 0/5 - - 0 ± 0 0 ± 0 0 ± 0
0.05 0/5 - - 0 ± 0 0 ± 0 0 ± 0
0.1* 4/5 29 ± 5 a 97 ± 11 a 87 ± 9 12 ± 4 99 ± 13
0.25* 5/5 20 ± 2 a 141 ± 23 a 153 ± 16 19 ± 11 172 ± 27

A Average of positive responders only. B If animals did not elicit emetic episodes, latency and duration are displayed as “-”. C Average of both non-responders and responders. Data are mean ± SEM. * indicate significant differences at p < 0.05 for incidence, retch, vomit and total emetic episodes. Different letters within a column indicate significant differences at p < 0.05.