Table 2.
Comparison of the performances for MOCGAOs with different learning methods
| m*n | HV | C | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gradient | Adam | C(Gradient, Adam) | C(Adam, Gradient) | |
| 5*100 | 6.79 | 222.76 | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| 5*200 | 23.59 | 202.64 | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| 5*300 | 17.84 | 253.20 | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| 10*100 | 64.10 | 642.33 | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| 10*200 | 105.87 | 462.18 | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| 10*300 | 97.13 | 617.41 | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| 15*100 | 132.17 | 1266.88 | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| 15*200 | 110.66 | 1882.61 | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| 15*300 | 214.91 | 2153.24 | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| 20*100 | 181.11 | 2664.65 | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| 20*200 | 163.32 | 1917.41 | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| 20*300 | 219.70 | 1873.09 | 0.00 | 1.00 |