Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Brain Imaging Behav. 2020 Dec;14(6):2569–2586. doi: 10.1007/s11682-019-00209-1

Table 3.

Age-by-Group interaction effects on the relative gray matter volumes of the ROIs. Multivariate analyses were carried out, with sex, handedness, cohort, and nonverbal IQ as covariates.

F p ηp2
Dorsal Pathway
Superior Temporal Gyrus (STG) R Age 2.22 .14 .02
Group .96 .33 .01
Age × Group .01 .94 < .01
L Age .01 .93 < .01
Group .01 .93 < .01
Age × Group .02 .90 < .01
Transverse Temporal Gyrus (TTG) R Age .07 .79 < .01
Group 1.63 .21 .02
Age × Group .37 .54 < .01
L Age .56 .46 .01
Group 6.48 .01* .07
Age × Group 3.67 .06 .04
Supramarginal Gyrus (SMG) R Age 2.11 .15 .02
Group < .01 .98 < .01
Age × Group .01 .92 < .01
L Age .03 .86 < .01
Group < .01 .97 < .01
Age × Group .01 .92 < .01
Pars Opercularis R Age 1.06 .31 .01
Group 1.72 .19 .02
Age × Group .40 .53 < .01
L Age .06 .82 < .01
Group .81 .37 .01
Age × Group 3.52 .06 .04
Ventral Pathway
Inferior Temporal Gyrus (ITG) R Age .60 .44 .01
Group 4.88 .03 .05
Age × Group .01 .95 < .01
L Age 1.97 .16 .02
Group 3.02 .09 .03
Age × Group .96 .33 .01
Middle Temporal Gyrus (MTG) R Age 2.06 .16 .02
Group 4.39 .04 .05
Age × Group .20 .66 < .01
L Age 6.23 .01* .06
Group .11 .75 < .01
Age × Group .03 .87 < .01
Pars Orbitalis R Age .30 .59 < .01
Group 7.16 .01* .07
Age × Group 4.63 .03 .05
L Age 1.46 .23 .02
Group .57 .45 .01
Age × Group .60 .44 .01
Pars Triangularis R Age 4.01 .05 .04
Group .69 .41 .01
Age × Group 5.87 .02 .06
L Age 6.64 .01* .07
Group .59 .44 .01
Age × Group 1.37 .24 .02
Temporal Pole R Age .29 .59 < .01
Group 9.17 < .01* .09
Age × Group .31 .58 < .01
L Age .04 .84 < .01
Group 11.11 < .01* .11
Age × Group 1.13 .29 .01

An asterisk (*) indicates that the p-value remains significant after false discovery rate (FDR) adjustment. ηp2 : partial eta-squared; L: Left; R: Right.