Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 8;11:41–52. doi: 10.2147/LCTT.S249928

Table 4.

Efficacy Outcomes of Eligible Studies

Study Treatment Lung NET (n) PR % DCR % Tumor Shrinkage (%) mPFS (m) HR M-fu (m)
Lung subgroup analysis RADIANT-2 EVE 10 mg + OCT LAR 30 mg or placebo + OCT LAR 30 mg 44 0 vs 0 NR 67 vs 27 13.63 vs 5.59 0.72 NR
Lung subgroup analysis RADIANT-4 EVE 10 mg or placebo 90 2 vs 4 81 vs 59 58 vs 13 9.2 vs 3.6 0.50 NR
ITMO 5-Year Update EVE 10 mg + OCT LAR 30 mg 11 9 (lung NET) 92 (general population)** NR 33.6 (general population) NR 50 (general population)
LUNA PAS or EVE 10 mg or combination 116 2.4 vs 2.4 vs 2.4* 36.5 vs 33.4 vs 51.2* 31 vs 49 vs 73 8.5 vs 12.5 vs 11.8 NR 12

Notes: *Response at month 9. **The authors affirmed that subgroup analyses by tumor primary site did not show any significant difference in ORR.

Abbreviations: DCR, disease control rate (defined as rate of complete, partial and stable responses by radiological assessment, according to criteria employed at the time of the manuscript publication); OCT, octreotide, PAS, pasireotide; PR, partial response; PFS, progression-free survival; HR, hazard ratio; fu, follow-up; EVE, everolimus; NR, not reported.