Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 1;206:116294. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116294

Table 3.

GLMM results of full model – Influence of Search extension variable and other sources of task difficulty on solution time, accuracy and search.

Random effects: Solution time
Accuracy
Search
variance (SD) variance (SD) variance (SD)
Item (Intercept) .0001 (.008) 0.501 (.71) .00 (.00)
Subject (Intercept) .0001 (.011) 0.277 (.53) .66 (.81)
Fixed effects: ß (SE) t-value ß (SE) z-value ß (SE) z-value
Intercept .072 (.02) 4.40** 2.04 (1.11) 1.83 -.98 (.29) −3.32**
Search extension -.057 (.01) −5.88** −4.55 (0.70) −6.49** .34 (.22) 1.55
Target words .053 (.03) 2.14* 2.77 (1.71) 1.62 -.41 (.38) −1.09
Prime -.026 (.01) −2.82* −0.99 (0.62) −1.58 .06 (.21) 0.26
RT .04 (.00) 26.75**

Note. Significance codes: 0.001 ’**’, 0.05 ’*’, ß ​= ​standardized mean estimates; standard errors (SE) or standard deviation (SD) is given in parenthesis. Prime ​= ​cosine distance between prime (dew) and solution (rain); Target words = mean cosine distance between all three target words per item (drop, coat, proof) and solution; Search extension = cosine distance between prime compound (dewdrop) & solution compound (raindrop). Random and fixed effects for solution time and accuracy are depicted for the full model. For search these effects are depicted for the full model ​+ ​RT, see Table 1a. Note, because solution time was modeled via a Gamma function with an inverse link function, the signs of the respective fixed effects are inverted.