Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 13;2020(56):133–153. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgaa008

Table 3.

Direct and indirect assessments of confounding reported in studies of leukemia*

Relevant study no. Relevant study name (reference) Confounder(s) considered Outcome(s) for confounding Effect of adjustment on ERR Comment Reference for confounding
Environmental studies
1 Chornobyl residents (19) SES Leukemia Not reported Generally similar education level of parents (as a proxy for SES) for cases and controls Davis et al. 2006 (19)
4 GB background (26) SES (Carstair's deprivation index based on census ward and father’s occupation) Childhood leukemia −32% to +32%, depending on SES metric

Main risk estimate adjusted for SES. May be relevant for similar studies

Kendall et al. 2013b (65)
Radon Childhood leukemia −42% A model including both gamma and radon dose to red bone marrow showed reduced ERR/Sv compared with model with just gamma dose Kendall et al. 2013a (26)
3 China background (23) Diet and nutrition, drinking water, pesticide residue, and Aflatoxin B1 in food, medical exposures, tobacco smoking, alcohol consumption Leukemia Not reported Distributions of those potential confounding factors did not differ much between high background radiation and control areas Tao et al. 2012 (23); Tao et al. 1996 (48); Zha et al. 1997 (49)
5 Swiss background (25) Residential mobility Childhood leukemia +28% when restricting to children with stable residence Main risk estimate is not adjusted for residence Spycher et al. 2015 (25)
Radon Childhood leukemia Not reported In a separate study, radon exposure not associated with childhood leukemia (HR at 90% radon percentile = 0.93, 95% CI = 0.74 to 1.16, compared with median radon) Hauri et al. 2013 (50)
7 Finnish background (24) Down syndrome, birth weight (large for gestational age), maternal smoking, CT Leukemia and leukemia subtypes Not reported Little change when accounting for these factors Nikkila et al. 2016 (24)
Medical studies
10,11 (11 adjusted for SES) French & UK pediatric CT (28, 29) SES Leukemia Not reported Lower frequency of CT scans among higher SES groups; leukemia incidence appears somewhat higher among children from households with higher SES (ie, SES confounding would attenuate ERR) Pearce et al. 2012 (66); Meulepas et al. 2017 (67)
SES Leukemia <2% RRs for dose categories differed by <2% when adjusted for quintiles of household income per postal area (average population, 40 persons) Meulepas et al. 2019 (52)
CSS Leukemia None Radiation risks unlikely substantially confounded by CSS Meulepas et al. 2016 (53)
10 French pediatric CT (28) CSS Leukemia −18% Adjustment for presence of any leukemia-specific CSS (mean cumulative bone marrow dose = 8.8 mGy and 10.4 mGy among children with and without leukemia-specific CSS). HR per bone marrow dose did not change when children with leukemia-specific CSS were excluded Journy et al. 2016a (28); Journy et al. 2016b (54)
11 UK pediatric CT (29) CSS Leukemia None Exclusion of patients with CSS did not alter dose–response relationship Berrington et al. 2016 (29)
Previous unreported cancers Leukemia −15% Based on confounder data for 40% of cohort Berrington et al. 2016 (29)
Occupational studies
14 Chornobyl liquidators: Belarus, Russia, & Baltic countries (32) Education, smoking, alcohol use, occupational and medical history, organization that sent liquidator to Chornobyl, date of start of mission, duration of mission, work on industrial site, personal monitoring of dose, use of protective measures, marital status Leukemia/lymphoma incidence Not reported Authors state that none of these factors modified OR by 10% or more Kesmeniene et al. 2012 (68)
20 Chornobyl liquidators: Ukraine (38) Education, smoking, alcohol use, medical or diagnostic radiation exposures, occupational exposures to chemicals or radiation before and after Chornobyl accident, urban/rural residential status at interview, age and year of first clean-up mission, type of work, total number of missions Leukemia incidence Not reported Authors state that distribution of these factors did not significantly differ between cases and controls Zablotska et al. 2013 (38)
17 Rocketdyne nuclear workers (35) Internal radiation Leukemia Not reported Authors state “other than for lung dose and bone marrow dose, the contribution of internal radiation dose to organs or tissues was not appreciable” Boice et al. 2011 (35)
22,23 US nuclear workers/ INWORKS (40, 41) Benzene; cigarette smoking; plutonium dose Leukemia −16% to −41%; −9%; +4% Benzene confounding greatest for early employment years and leukemias of uncertain subtype Schubauer-Berigan et al. 2007 (60)
Benzene; SES Leukemia (non-CLL) <15% (direction not reported) <15% change in ERR when adjusting for benzene or SES exposure in leukemia case-control study among US nuclear workers Daniels et al. 2013 (69)
15 UK NRRW (33) SES Leukemia Not reported Authors state that omitting SES adjustment had little impact on ERR/Sv Muirhead 2009b (56)
*

CI = confidence interval; CLL = chronic lymphocytic leukemia; CSS = cancer susceptibility syndrome; CT = computed tomography; ERR = excess relative risk; ERR/Sv = excess relative risk per Sievert; GB = Great Britain; HR = hazard ratio; INWORKS = International Nuclear Workers Study; NRRW = National Registry for Radiation Workers; SES = socioeconomic status; USRT = US Radiologic Technologists.