Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 13;36(Suppl 1):i3–i11. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa441

Table 4.

Comparison of resource usage between complete assembly and partitioned assembly for the Zymo datasets. The best values are highlighted in bold text.

Dataset Performance metric metaFlye assembly
Canu assembly
Complete assembly Partitioned assembly Complete assembly Partitioned assembly
Zymo-1Y2B Assembly time (h) 12.15 9.25 74.61 58.01
Memory usage (GB) 35.34 24.21 13.18 8.01
Zymo-1Y3B Assembly time (h) 15.40 11.96 86.51 78.33
Memory usage (GB) 36.53 22.16 18.43 7.85
Zymo-2Y2B Assembly time (h) 13.41 10.43 75.20 61.12
Memory usage (GB) 35.41 23.42 19.45 11.46
Zymo-2Y3B Assembly time (h) 16.51 13.49 87.22 82.93
Memory usage (GB) 35.81 23.81 22.15 7.94
Zymo-2Y4B Assembly time (h) 20.74 15.63 102.13 101.16
Memory usage (GB) 54.84 21.65 25.78 12.44
Zymo-All (Nicholls et al., 2019) Assembly time (h) 45.95 36.45 437.99 258.00
Memory usage (GB) 129.36 16.19 108.50 21.76

Note: Assembly time for partitioned assemblies includes the CPU time elapsed for binning using MetaBCC-LR and metagenomics assembly.