Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 13;36(Suppl 1):i3–i11. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa441

Table 7.

Comparison of alternative approaches with MetaBCC-LR using the Zymo-2Y4B dataset. The best values are highlighted in bold text.

Method No. of bins identified Precision (%) Recall (%) F1 score (%) ARI (%)
Composition first 5 92.71 90.14 91.41 79.78
k-mer Coverage + Composition 2 99.59 47.80 64.60 0.43
Coverage first (MetaBCC-LR) 6 98.46 98.46 98.64 97.21