Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 4;2020:3964973. doi: 10.1155/2020/3964973

Table 2.

Fall risk score using the physiological profile assessment compared with frailty status in older adults.

Component Frailty status Mean ± SD 95% confidence interval p value
Visual contrast sensitivity (dB) Nonfrailtya 17 ± 4.29 15.82, 18.18 <0.001acbc
Prefrailtyb 16.10 ± 5.00 15.50, 16.68
Frailtyc 8.44 ± 6.34 6.15, 10.72

Proprioception (degree) Nonfrailtya 2.29 ± 0.95 2.02, 2.55 0.001ac ab
Prefrailtyb 2.72 ± 1.49 2.54, 2.89
Frailtyc 3.53 ± 1.99 2.81, 4.25

Knee extension strength (kg) Nonfrailtya 19.07 ± 8.07 16.84, 21.29 <0.001ac ab bc
Prefrailtyb 14.13 ± 6.32 13.39, 14.87
Frailtyc 7.57 ± 4.40 5.98, 9.16

Hand reaction time (ms) Nonfrailtya 345.17 ± 94.99 318.99, 371.35 <0.001ac ab
Prefrailtyb 395.51 ± 136.49 379.51, 411.51
Frailtyc 472.69 ± 228.53 390.29, 555.08

Sway path (mm2) Nonfrailtya 1216.24 ± 840.43 984.59, 1447.89 <0.001ac bc
Prefrailtyb 1367.63 ± 1258.65 1220.10, 1515.17
Frailtyc 2435.25 ± 1951.94 1731.50, 3139.00

PPA fall risk (Z-score) Nonfrailtya 2.15 ± 1.02 1.87, 2.42) <0.001ac ab bc
Prefrailtyb 2.70 ± 1.38 2.54, 2.86)
Frailtyc 4.47 ± 1.65 3.87, 5.06)

ac: nonfrailty group compared with the frailty group; ab: nonfrailty group compared with the prefrailty group; bc: prefrailty group compared with the frailty group; PPA = physiological profile assessment.