Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Fungal Genet Biol. 2019 Jul 4;131:103249. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2019.103249

TABLE 1. A sample of studies that have used both the SGC and the CBD criteria in fungi.

Table S2 shows a complete list of studies using SGC; Table S3 shows a complete list of studies using CBD.

Taxon SGC Species reported with SGC CBD Species reported with CBD
Protoparmelia s. str. Concordance + Support 25 BP&P, spedeSTEM 19,23
Trebouxia Concordance + Support 6 GMYC 4,6
Geopyxis Concordance + Support 6 BP&P 8
Diploschistes Support 8 BP&P 8
Serendipita vermifera Support 8 BP&P 8
Colletotrichum cliviae Support 3 PTP 3
Cryptococcus gattii/Cryptococcus neoformans Support 7 GMYC 6-8
Cladonia mediterranea Concordance + Support 2 spedeSTEM 2
Peltigera Support 5 bGMYC, bPTP, spedeSTEM, BP&P 14*
Montanelia Support at least 8 GMYC, PTP 6-8
Oropogon Support at least 10 GMYC at least 10
Collemopsidium Support 26 GMYC 26-28
Hesperomyces virescens Concordance + Support 3 GMYC, PTP 3
Macalpinomyces Support 1 GMYC, PTP 10,11
Graphis scripta Support at least 7 GMYC 6,7
Fomitopis pinicola Support 3 BP&P 4
*

authors state that this result might be intraspecific population structure.