Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 1;9(6):1663. doi: 10.3390/jcm9061663

Table 1.

Patient characteristics of the screening populations.

Learning Set
BEV + CT (n = 58)
Control Set
CT Alone (n = 57)
Median age (Range) 62 (34–81) 59 (36–86)
DFS ≤24 months 15 (26%) 9 (16%)
>24 months 27 (47%) 34 (60%)
de novo metastatic 16 (28%) 14 (25%)
ECOG PS 0–1 56 (97%) 51 (90%)
2–4 and unknown 2 (3%) 7 (12%)
Histology Ductal 43 (74%) 45 (79%)
Lobular 11 (19%) 7 (12%)
Others and unknown 4 (7%) 5 (9%)
Grade 1 1 (2%) 3 (5%)
2 34 (59%) 32 (56%)
3 22 (38%) 21 (37%)
Unknown 1 (2%) 1 (2%)
Receptor Status HR+/HER2/G1–2 30 (52%) 24 (42%)
HR+/HER2/G3 11 (19%) 9 (16%)
HR+/HER2+ 2 (3%) 9 (16%)
HR/HER2+ 1 (2%) 4 (7%)
Triple negative 13 (22%) 10 (18%)
HR+/HER2/G unknown 1 (3%) 1 (2%)
Metastases Visceral 37 (64%) 37 (65%)
Non-visceral 21 (36%) 20 (35%)
Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy 27 (47%) 26 (46%)
Adjuvant Chemotherapy 1 Anthracycline alone 8 (14%) 10 (18%)
Taxane alone 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
Anthracycline and taxane 20 (35%) 6 (11%)
No adjuvant chemotherapy 27 (47%) 35 (61%)
Chemotherapy Backbone 2,3 Paclitaxel 30 (52%) 214 (37%)
Docetaxel 5 (9%) 115 (19%)
Capecitabine 21 (36%) 9 6 (16%)
Taxane and trastuzumab 2 (3%) 10 7 (18%)
Others 0 (0%) 6 8 (11%)
Sample Type Primary tumor 42 (72%) 38 (67%)
Metastasis 16 (28%) 19 (33%)
Biopsy 22 (38%) 27 (47%)
Resection 36 (62%) 30 (53%)
PFS Number of events 54 (93%) 53 (93%)
Median PFS (95%-CI) 10.91 (8.02–14.55) 11.79 (8.74–16.3)
OS Number of events 44 (76%) 50 (88%)
Median OS (95%-CI) 27.3 (22.1–40.4) 23.0 (12.4–36.2)

As the learning set and control set are not compared with each other, no p value is given. BEV:bevacizumab; CT: chemotherapy; DFS: disease-free survival; ECOG PS: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status; HR: hormone receptor; PFS: progression-free survival; OS: overall survival. 1 Test performed without empty categories ′taxane′ and ′de novo metastatic disease′ using Fisher’s exact test. In the control group 29 patients were treated with a chemotherapy combination. 2,3 Paclitaxel was combined in eight patients (14.0%) with epirubicin and in one patient (1.8%) with capecitabin. Docetaxel was combined in five patients (8.8%) with epirubicin. Capecitabine was combined in three patients (5.2%) with vinorelbine and in one patient (1.8%) with gemcitabine. Taxan and trastuzumab was combined in two patients (3.5%) with epirubicin. five Patients (8.8%) received epirubicin in combination with cyclophosphamide.