Skip to main content
. 2020 May 10;7(2):43. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering7020043

Table 1.

Reported recent literature studies on UASB treatment of high-loaded substrates.

Substrate Temperature (°C) Influent Chemical Oxygen Demand (g/L) Chemical Oxygen Demand Removal (%) Hydraulic Retention Time (h) Organic Loading Rate (g COD/L·d) Methane Yield Reference
Glutamate-rich wastewater 35 2.0 95.5–96.5 4.5–6 8.26–10.82 0.31 1 [25]
Monosodium glutamate 35 7.9 97 24 8 2.3 2 [26]
Sugarcane bagasse hydrolysate 20–30 1.82 86 18.4 2.4 0.27 1 [27]
Recycled paper mill wastewater 37 5.7 80.6 15.14 5.18 0.89 2 [28]
Vinasse Ambient 120.2 91–93 40 72.1 0.46–0.53 2 [18]
Guar 37 1.1 79–84 10 2.78 0.15–0.16 3 [29]
Synthetic fiber wastewater 13.9–32.1 1.7–30.7 75.8 24 1.3–21.5 0.4–2 2 [30]
Pistachio wastewater 35 49.8 89.8 5.4 d 4.56 0.33 1 [31]
Perchlorate 30 - 84.7 2.2 9.96 - [32]
Synthetic slaughterhouse wastewater 37 1.7 70 10 3.94–8.15 0.35 2 [33]
Chocolate wastewater 15–30 6.2 39–94 6 2–6 0.3–1.9 4 [34]
Pig slurry 36 21.5 - 1.5 d 14.3–16.4 0.25 1 [35]
Leachate from waste incineration 35 36.8 97.5–99.5 1.3–3 d 1.86–7.43 - [36]

1 L CH4/g COD, 2 L CH4/L·d, 3 L CH4/g COD d, 4 L biogas/L·d.