Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 20;9(6):775. doi: 10.3390/plants9060775

Table 1.

Effect of biostimulants on Annurca fruit color (L* a* b*) with different exposure at harvest. ns, *, *** non-significant or significant at p ≤ 0.05 and 0.001, respectively. Different letters within each column indicate significant differences according to Duncan’s multiple-range test (p = 0.05). All of the data are expressed as mean ±SE, n = 20.

Source of Variance L* a* b*
Biostimulant (B)
Control 65.20 ± 0.87 a -2.83 ± 1.73 c 32.33 ± 0.75 a
PEP 53.87 ± 1.31 c 12.91 ± 1.75 a 24.70 ± 1.02 c
LG 60.79 ± 1.09 b 2.07 ± 1.76 b 27.96 ± 0.97 b
MA 52.29 ± 1.16 c 14.94 ± 1.68 a 22.61 ± 0.89 d
Exposure of fruit (E)
Shadow 66.06 ± 0.97 a −6.81 ± 1.52 c 33.45 ± 0.82 a
Intermediate 1 59.45 ± 1.07 b 5.00 ± 1.65 b 27.71 ± 0.88 b
Intermediate 2 58.73 ± 1.10 b 5.21 ± 1.58 b 27.35 ± 0.89 b
Sun 47.91 ± 0.99 c 23.69 ± 1.09 a 19.10 ± 0.66 c
B × E
Control × Shadow 71.63 ± 0.38 a −15.55 ± 0.40 g 37.31 ± 0.56 a
Control × Intermediate 1 66.49 ± 1.15 abc −7.26 ± 1.81 ef 33.82 ± 0.93 abc
Control × Intermediate 2 67.40 ± 0.87 abc −6.00 ± 2.06 def 34.24 ± 1.06 ab
Control × Sun 55.29 ± 1.68 d 17.49 ± 3.24 bc 23.97 ± 1.29 f
PEP × Shadow 62.20 ± 2.64 c −1.44 ± 3.82 de 32.11 ± 2.23 bcd
PEP × Intermediate 1 56.19 ± 2.12 d 10.92 ± 2.58 c 25.53 ± 1.59 ef
PEP × Intermediate 2 52.33 ± 2.18 de 15.01 ± 2.35 bc 23.16 ± 1.63 f
PEP × Sun 44.76 ± 2.01 fg 27.15 ± 1.41 a 18.01 ± 1.29 h
LG × Shadow 68.14 ± 1.12 ab −10.86 ± 1.80 fg 34.27 ± 1.32 ab
LG × Intermediate 1 63.21 ± 1.91 bc −0.94 ± 2.69 de 29.17 ± 1.91 de
LG × Intermediate 2 62.44 ± 1.54 c −2.17 ± 2.62 de 29.56 ± 1.51 cde
LG × Sun 49.38 ± 1.55 ef 22.24 ± 1.69 ab 18.83 ± 1.12 gh
MA × Shadow 62.30 ± 1.95 c 0.59 ± 3.33 d 30.11 ± 1.63 bcd
MA × Intermediate 1 51.89 ± 1.65 de 17.29 ± 2.94 bc 22.30 ± 1.41 fg
MA × Intermediate 2 52.75 ± 1.85 de 13.99 ± 2.56 c 22.42 ± 1.50 fg
MA × Sun 42.22 ± 1.39 g 27.90 ± 0.88 a 15.61 ± 0.88 h
Significance
Biostimulant (B) *** *** ***
Exposure of fruit (E) *** *** ***
B × E ns * ns