Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 15;9(6):1858. doi: 10.3390/jcm9061858

Table 3.

Diagnostic performance of the established algorithm for the prediction of submucosal invasion in the external test dataset.

Model AUC Accuracy (%) Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) Positive Predictive Value (%) Negative Predictive Value (%)
Whole dataset
Inception-Resnet-v2 0.769 (0.755–0.783) 74.1 (71.0–77.2) 72.5 (72.5–72.5) 74.3 (73.0–75.7) 64.2 (62.9–65.5) 81.0 (80.7–81.3)
DenseNet−161 0.887 (0.863–0.910) 77.3 (75.4–79.3) 80.4 (79.6–81.3) 80.7 (78.5–83.0) 72.6 (70.1–75.1) 86.6 (85.9–87.4)
EGC (n = 60)
Inception-Resnet-v2 0.609 (0.572–0.647) 65.0 (61.7–68.3) 58.0 (55.1–60.8) 62.2 (56.9–67.5) 52.2 (40.8–63.6) 70.4 (67.3–73.4)
DenseNet−161 0.747 (0.712–0.782) 67.2 (64.4–70.1) 65.2 (65.2–65.2) 70.3 (67.2–73.4) 57.8 (55.3–60.3) 76.5 (75.7–77.2)

AUC, area under the curve; EGC, early gastric cancer.