Table 1.
Diet Intake | Body Weight | Body Weight Gain | Body Lean | Body Fat | Epididymal Fat | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
g/day | g | g | % | % | % | |
Group 1 | ||||||
LC (n = 8) | 15.6 ± 0.3 | 259 ± 3.4 | 113 ± 3.2 | 66.4 ± 1.53 b | 23.6 ± 1.46 c | 0.96 ± 0.07 c |
LPO (n = 8) | 15.1 ± 0.3 | 266 ± 4.5 | 117 ± 4.1 | 68.4 ± 0.59 ab | 23.2 ± 0.67 c | 0.86 ± 0.06 c |
LHO (n = 8) | 15.0 ± 0.3 | 264 ± 5.1 | 115 ± 5.1 | 70.9 ± 0.92 a | 21.2 ± 0.82 c | 0.80 ± 0.05 c |
OC (n = 6) | 24.2 ± 0.8 | 379 ± 14.2 | 197 ± 6.2 | 23.4 ± 1.36 d | 69.1 ± 1.25 a | 2.10 ± 0.08 a |
OPO (n = 6) | 23.2 ± 0.9 | 377 ± 13.7 | 187 ± 7.4 | 29.9 ± 1.20 c | 65.1 ± 1.44 b | 1.91 ± 0.05 b |
OHO (n = 6) | 24.2 ± 0.5 | 381 ± 13.2 | 197 ± 5.4 | 31.2 ± 1.00 c | 62.6 ± 0.81 b | 1.92 ± 0.09 ab |
Oil type (O) | ||||||
Control (n = 14) | 19.3 | 310 | 149 | 48.0 | 43.1 | 1.45 |
Poppy seed oil (n = 14) | 18.5 | 313 | 147 | 51.9 | 41.1 | 1.31 |
Hemp seed oil (n = 14) | 18.9 | 314 | 150 | 53.9 | 38.9 | 1.23 |
p value | 0.053 | NS | NS | <0.001 | <0.005 | <0.05 |
Zucker phenotype (T) | ||||||
Lean (n = 24) | 15.2 | 263 | 115 | 68.6 | 22.7 | 0.876 |
Obese (n = 18) | 23.9 | 379 | 194 | 28.2 | 65.6 | 1.98 |
p value | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Interaction O × T | ||||||
p value | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS |
Values are the mean ± SEM. NS, p > 0.05. 1 LC, lean rats fed a control diet with palm oil; LPO, lean rats fed a diet with poppy seed oil; LHO, lean rats fed a diet with hemp seed oil; OC, obese rats fed a control diet with palm oil; OPO, obese rats fed a diet with poppy seed oil; OHO, obese rats fed a diet with hemp seed oil. a–c Mean values within a column with different superscript letters were shown to be significantly different (p < 0.05); differences among the groups are only indicated with superscripts in the case of a statistically significant interaction O × T and differences between the oil type (p ≤ 0.05).