Skip to main content
. 2020 May 18;103(1):315–324. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.19-0866

Table 1.

Summary statistics from the three different datasets analyzed

Dataset POC-CCA mapping POC-CCA and KK comparison Assessment with CAA in Leiden
Number of schools 388 175 8
Number of pupils 19,371 8,697 396
Age of pupils (years), mean (SD) 13.4 (0.75) 13.3 (0.75) 13.4 (0.67)
Percentage female 50.1 49.9 50.0
Prevalence, % (school IQR) CCA trace negative in Rwanda 7.4 (0.0–8.0) 8.6 (1.0–8.0) 31.3 (32.0 –37.1)
CCA trace positive in Rwanda 36.1 (20.0–47.0) 37.5 (22.0–49.0) 65.7 (64.0–78.5)
Kato–Katz in Rwanda 2.0 (0.0–0.0) 8.1 (3.0–11.2)
CCA trace negative in Leiden 33.8 (25.5–47.8)
CCA trace positive in Leiden 55.8 (50.0–75.0)
CAA in Leiden 44.2 (31.0–63.5)

IQR = interquartile range; KK= Kato–Katz; POC-CCA = point-of-care circulating cathodic antigen. The 175 schools assessed by POC-CCA (CCA) and KK were a subset of the 388 schools assessed using POC-CCA, and the eight purposively selected schools also assessed by POC-CCA and CAA in Leiden were a subset of the 175 schools assessed with POC-CCA and KK in Rwanda. Variability between schools was reported as IQR of the school prevalence estimates. Note that 81% of schools sampled recorded no infections by KK.