Skip to main content
. 2020 May 19;103(1):12–17. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.20-0256

Table 2.

Key interventions to consider for the COVID-19 response

Technical area 10th Democratic Republic of the Congo Ebola virus disease response Relevance for COVID-19 response
Response coordination Incident management system to improve information flow and decentralize decision-making Use of an incident management system to support coordination of COVID-19 response
Under government leadership, ensure routine strategic meetings
Creation of functional groups with clear roles and responsibilities to ensure improved span of control and chain of command Need for a multi-sectorial response
Decentralized operational coordination at the subdistrict level Development of key performance indicators to ensure corrective action for critical response interventions
Monitoring framework comprehensive: inputs, outputs, outcomes, and impacts
Key performance indicator developed to ensure corrective action
Surveillance Monitoring unit established to improve follow-up of lost contacts Establish monitoring uni/structure to improve follow-up of contacts lost to follow-up
Involve community structures at early stage of surveillance activities to generate alerts
Food distribution provided to contacts
Consider food distributions to communities under isolation/quarantine
Community leaders involved in ensuring proper contact tracin
Identify individuals with field epidemiology expertise to conduct surveillance activities (including contact tracing)
Conduct rapid training of surveillance team members to investigate alerts, and collect and analyze epidemiologic information
Active case finding and door-to-door activities implemented to improve case detection coupled with community watch interventions to ensure tracking of movements (new arrivals, deaths, and illnesses)
Investigate alerts reported by households, community leaders, or health facilities and report validated alerts within 24 hours
Active case search in health facilities
Functional triage systems in health facilities
An alert monitoring and investigation platform that helped investigate cases within 24 hours
Risk communication and community engagement Community-centered approach with feedback mechanisms to follow and address rumors Early involvement of anthropologists and social scientists in the development of risk communication and community engagement approaches
Anthropologists and social scientist engaged to provide feedback on different response measures
Creation of feedback mechanisms to better target activities
Trust gained from local religious, traditional, and community leaders to mitigate community reticence
Prepare communities to play active role with other response interventions
Community structures and community health workers who speak local language used to better communicate with communities
Early identification and engagement with community leaders to mitigate community reticence to response interventions
Anthropologists and/or social scientists included in part of the response
Infection prevention and control (IPC) Established standardized package for IPC Define and implement a standardized IPC package
Capitalize on IPC tool kit and standard package for training of trainers
Implemented ring IPC with supervision (IPC focal point at health facilities) and frequent evaluations (use of IPC score card)
Target traditional healers and pharmacists
Used evidence to adapt and improve strategy
Case management and free care Decentralized transit centers used to rapidly test and isolate cases in setting close to communities, which also improved willingness to seek care Consider a similar model of decentralized care and testing
Disseminate standardized guidelines on optimized care based on existing/evolving evidence
Ensure that free-care models can cope with increased use of health services
Create SOPs and guidelines for optimized care based on existing evidence
Consider compassionate use for investigational drugs and conduct studies to look at effectiveness
Operational preparedness Defined a package of activities for operational preparedness to reduce the risk of spreading Ebola virus disease to at-risk areas Anticipate mechanism to increase capacity for control measures (early detection, investigation, laboratory confirmation, isolation, and treatment
Deployed experts to at-risk health zone to implement readiness activities and strengthen the health system Work on mass training mechanism and prepositioning of treatment items (critical care, ventilators…)
Conduct training to equip health zones based on clear protocols and package of activities
Use similar preparedness package of interventions for COVID-19
Trained rapid response teams to investigate alerts in non-affected health zones
Analytics cell Set up epidemiological and social sciences analysis structure to provide real-time integrated analysis Develop integrated analysis structure to provide real-time insights and design appropriate response
Monitor epidemiolocal trends beyond that of the outbreak (concurrent diseases) to mitigated impacts of outbreak and response
Monitor perceptions and reported use of health services
Regularly monitoring and understanding of health behavior trends (perceptions and reported use—mixed analysis)
Used evidence to inform different response measures
Set up mechanisms to monitor and track recommendations
Donor coordination Preparation of a unique strategic response plan, with validated unit costs for all response interventions Ensure global donor coordination
Ensure alignment with national strategies
Establish processes, including eligibility criteria for hazard payments, pay scales, and payment modalities, as well as mechanisms to systematically list healthcare workers
Involvement in the planning process and continuous interaction to share challenges and gaps to be filled
Ensuring resources as well as technical support were provided just in time based on priority areas and gap filling.