Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 6;103(1):465–471. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.19-0862

Table 3.

Results of home visits for reported household water source, treatment method, child water consumption, and presence of chlorine in stored water over 25 biweekly visits, by treatment group, hollow fiber ultrafilter evaluation, Kenya, April 2010–March 2011

Total,* n (%) Intervention,* n (%) Comparison,* n (%) P-value
Water source < 0.001
 Improved 2096/3,952 (53.0) 1,108/2,193 (50.5) 988/1759 (56.2)
 Unimproved 1856/3,952 (47.0) 1,085/2,193 (49.5) 771/1759 (43.8)
Treated drinking water 706/3,952 (17.9) 540/2,193 (24.6) 166/1759 (9.4) < 0.001
Drinking water treatment for infants 3,926/3,948 (99.4) 2,178/2,192 (99.4) 1748/1756 (99.5) 0.44
 Hollow fiber ultrafilter 1768 (45.0) 1765 (81.0) 3 (0.2) < 0.001
 WaterGuard 1851 (47.2) 768 (41.5) 1,083 (58.5) < 0.001
 Boiling 156 (4.0) 20 (0.9) 136 (7.8) < 0.001
 PUR 12 (0.3) 7 (0.3) 5 (0.3) 0.84
 Untreated 848 (21.6) 198 (23.4) 650 (37.2) < 0.001
Chlorine present in stored water 0.33
 Positive (≥ 0.1 mg/mL) 201/3,795 (5.3) 103/2,100 (4.9) 98/1,695 (5.8)
 Negative 3,593/3,795 (94.7) 1996/2,100 (95.1) 1,597/1,695 (94.2)
*

Discrepancies from total N are due to missing values.

Crude analysis using the chi-square or Fisher’s exact test as appropriate.