Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 28;25(7):609–619. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0703

Table 2.

Bivariate outcomes after completion of I Can PIC or attention control by study conditions

Measures I Can PIC (n = 106) Attention control (n = 100) p valuea
Health insurance knowledge score 98 <.0001
Mean (SD) 89.29 (12.31) 74.38 (17.98)
Range (possible 0–100) 50–100 25–100
Certainty of choice (SURE) .094
Mean (SD), possible range 0–4 3.06 (1.34) 2.70 (1.50) .174
No conflict, n (%) 63 (59.43) 50 (50.00)
Significant conflict, n (%) 43 (40.57) 50 (50.00)
Decision self‐efficacy .522
Mean (SD) 75.39 (28.09) 73.58 (26.41)
Median 87.50 79.17
Range (possible 0–100) 0–100 8.33–100
HILM, n (%)
HILM 1–Confidence estimating cost of care 43 (40.57) 36 (36.00) .501
Very confident 63 (59.43) 64 (64.00)
Not confident or a little confident n = 99
HILM 2–Confidence understanding health insurance terms .002
Very confident 57 (53.77) 32 (32.32)
Not at all or a little confident 32 (32.32) 57 (53.77)
Plan choice intentions .132
Keeping current plan 92 90
Yes 46 (50.00) 55 (61.11)
No 46 (50.00) 35 (38.89)

The denominator for the percentages is the sum of patients across all categories, excluding missing values.

a

Chi‐square or Fisher's exact test for categorical variable; Kruskal‐Wallis test for continuous variable.

Abbreviation: HILM, Health Insurance Literacy Measure.