Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 9;9(6):1798. doi: 10.3390/jcm9061798

Table 1.

Robotic-assisted simple prostatectomy (RASP) series in the literature.

Study Study Type Year Number of Patients Approach Prostate Volume (mL) Operation Time (min) Conversion to OSP (%) EBL (mL) Transfusion Rate (%) Specimen Weight (g) Catheher Removal Time (Days) Length of Stay (Days) Complications (%)
Sotelo et al. [3] NC 2008 7 T 77.7 195 0 382 14.3 50.5 7.5 1.3 14
Yuh et al. [12] NC 2008 3 T 323 211 0 558 33 301 NA 1.3 33
John et al. [13] NC 2009 13 E 100 210 0 500 0 82 6 6 7.7
Uffort et al. [14] NC 2010 15 T 70.9 128.8 0 139.3 0 46.4 4.6 2.5 7
Sutherland et al. [15] NC 2011 9 T 136.5 183 11.1 206 0 112 13 1.3 56
Vora et al. [17] NC 2012 13 T 163 179 0 219 0 127 2.7 8.8 7.7
Fareed et al. [18] NC 2012 8 E 130 230 0 425 87.5 78 11 4.5 37.5
Matei et al. [19] NC 2012 35 T 96.2 186 0 121 0 87 7.4 3.2 0
Coelho et al. [16] NC 2012 6 T 157 90 0 208 0 145 4.8 1 0
Dubey et al. [35] NC 2012 3 E NA 220 0 160 NA NA 3 3.5 NA
Clavijo et al. [20] NC 2013 10 T 81 106 0 375 10 81 8.9 1 20
Banapour et al. [10] NC 2014 16 T+E 141.8 228 0 197 0 94.2 8 1.3 12.5
Leslie et al. [21] NC 2014 25 T 149.6 214 0 143 4 88 9 4 20
Stolzenburg et al. [24] NC 2014 10 E 143.9 122.5 0 228.8 0 102 7.4 8.4 10
Nestler et al. [22] NC 2014 18 T 91 193 0 190 5.5 91 5.3 NA 5.5
Elsamra et al. [23] NC 2014 15 T 156 189 0 290 0 110 8.67 2.4 14
Patel et al. [25] NC 2014 20 T+E NA NA NA NA NA 134.7 NA 1.7 NA
Nething et al. [26] NC 2014 7 T 144.9 204.7 0 521 NA 96.3 8.28 2.57 0
Autorino et al. [37] C 2015 487 T+E 110 154.5 3.1 200 1 75 7 2 16.6
Pokorny et al. [27] NC 2015 69 T 129 97 0 200 1.5 84 3 4 33
Hoy et al. [36] C 2015 4 T 238 161.3 0 218.8 0 123.6 NA 2.3 0
Castillo et al. [28] NC 2016 34 T 117 96 0 200 5.8 76 4.6 2.2 20.5
Martin Garzon et al. [38] C 2016 154 E 78 157 0.7 455 6 71 9.3 NA 12
Pavan et al. [39] C 2016 130 T+E 118.5 150 10.8 250 NA 77 5 5 16.9
Umari et al. [40] C 2017 81 T 130 105 0 250 1.2 89 3 4 31
Zhang et al. [41] C 2017 32 E NA 274 NA NA 9.4 110 8 2.3 3.1
Sorokin et al. [42] C 2017 59 T 136.9 161.4 0 339 3.4 82.9 5.7 1.5 19
Cacciamani et al. [29] NC 2018 23 T 108.1 160.6 0 98.6 0 63.1 7 2.1 4.3
Wang et al. [30] NC 2018 27 T 82 169 0 235 0 47.5 1.6 3 22.2
Chavali et al. [31] NC 2018 28 T 180 180 0 200 0 90 8 2 14
Johnson et al. [33] NC 2018 120 T 121.5 157 0 NA 3.3 74 4 1 18.3
Nestler et al. [44] C 2019 35 NA 94.5 182 0 NA 9.4 77 5 5 25
Mourmouris et al. [43] C 2019 26 T NA 133.6 0 274 0 115 3 3.4 3.8
Simone et al. [32] NC 2019 12 T 102 150 0 250 8 78 7 3 30
Steinberg et al. [34] NC 2019 10 E 104 172 0 141 0 65 1.9 1.1 0
Study Study Type Preop IPSS Postop IPSS Preop QoL Postop QoL Preop IIEF/SHIM Postop IIEF/SHIM Preop Qmax (mL/sn) Postop Qmax (mL/sn) Preop PVR (mL) Postop PVR (mL) Postop İncontinence Bladder neck Contracture (n) Follow up (Months)
Sotelo et al. [3] NC 22 1.7 3.8 2.3 NA NA 17.7 55.5 NA NA NA N/A 0
Yuh et al. [12] NC 17.7 NA 4.1 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 0 1 NA
John et al. [13] NC NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 23 85 0 NA 1 13
Uffort et al. [14] NC 23.9 1.8 4.9 2.2 NA NA NA NA 265.8 44.2 NA N/A 3
Sutherland et al. [15] NC 17.8 7.8 NA NA 12.7 (SHIM) 12.5 (SHIM) NA NA 214 18.2 1 N/A 9
Vora et al. [17] NC 18.2 5.3 NA NA NA NA 4.4 19.1 207.3 12.7 0 N/A 7.2
Fareed et al. [18] NC 19.5 3 NA NA NA NA 5.2 18 60 37 0 N/A 1
Matei et al. [19] NC 28 7 NA NA NA NA 6.6 18.9 NA NA NA N/A 0
Coelho et al. [16] NC 19.8 5.5 NA NA NA NA 7.7 19 NA NA 0 N/A 2
Dubey et al. [35] NC NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA N/A NA
Clavijo et al. [20] NC 18.8 1.7 3.7 0.5 NA NA 12.4 33.5 NA NA 0 N/A 1
Banapour et al. [10] NC 22 7 4 2 NA NA NA NA 194 56 0 N/A 0
Leslie et al. [21] NC 23.9 3.6 NA NA 12.8 (SHIM) NA 11.3 20 208.1 36.9 1 N/A 6
Stolzenburg et al. [24] NC 21.9 3.4 NA NA NA NA 9.3 20.7 121.9 57.5 0 N/A 6
Nestler et al. [22] NC 25 6.1 5 1.1 59 (IIEF) 56.8 (IIEF) 9 28.2 NA NA 1 0 1
Elsamra et al. [23] NC 16.2 4.5 NA NA NA NA NA NA 428 33 3 N/A 3
Patel et al. [25] NC 14.7 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 414 NA NA N/A NA
Nething et al. [26] NC NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 0 N/A 10
Autorino et al. [37] C 23 7 4 NA 15 (SHIM) 15 (SHIM) 8 25 108 NA NA 3 patients 12
Pokorny et al. [27] NC 25 3 NA NA NA NA 7 23 73 0 0 N/A 6
Hoy et al. [36] C NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA N/A 3
Castillo et al. [28] NC 23.5 7.1 NA NA NA NA 10.4 23.1 NA NA 0 1 patient 12
Martin Garzon et al. [38] C 22 6.5 3.8 1 18.5 (SHIM) 16 (SHIM) 11.5 33 NA NA 9 1 patient developed anterior urethral stricture 12
Pavan et al. [39] C 23 5 6 NA 18 (SHIM) 17 (SHIM) 9 22 NA NA NA N/A 10.3
Umari et al. [40] C 25 5 NA NA NA NA 8 23 73 0 1 0 12
Zhang et al.[41] C NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA N/A NA
Sorokin et al. [42] C 18.8 7.3 3.9 1.3 NA NA 9.8 22.4 118 3.5 0 0 6
Cacciamani et al. [29] NC 23.1 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 0 N/A 3
Wang et al. [30] NC 25 NA 6 NA 18 (IIEF) 17.5 (IIEF) 6 NA 85 NA 0 No strictue but 7 patients required closure of small urethrotomies 16.4
Chavali et al. [31] NC 19 NA NA NA NA NA 9 NA 120 NA NA N/A NA
Johnson et al. [33] NC NA NA NA NA NA NA 8.9 18.8 NA 9 0 N/A 3.2
Nestler et al. [44] C 23 NA 5 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 0 N/A 12
Mourmouris et al. [43] C 22.9 5.7 NA NA NA NA 10.1 19.1 178.5 25.5 NA N/A 3
Simone et al. [32] NC 33 6 NA NA 27 (IIEF) 27 (IIEF) 7.7 18.6 175 30 0 N/A 12
Steinberg et al. [34] NC 20.8 12.9 NA NA NA NA 8.6 11.2 119 40.9 1 (transient) N/A 28.7

EBL, estimated blood loss; IPSS, international prostate symptom score; QoL, quality of life; Qmax, maximum urinary flow rate; PVR, postvoid residual urine; IIEF, international index of erectile function; SHIM, Sexual Health Inventory for Men; NC, non-comparative; C, comparative.