Table 3.
Statistical comparison of nutritional diagnosis and screening tools values at hospital admission.
| MUST | SGA | NRS-2002 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GLIM | Low Risk | Medium/High Risk | Total | Well Nourished | Moderately/Severely Malnourished | Total | Low Risk | Medium/High Risk | Total |
| Well nourished | 67 | 15 | 82 | 12 | 70 | 82 | 62 | 20 | 82 |
| Malnutrition | 25 | 45 | 70 | 3 | 67 | 70 | 37 | 33 | 70 |
| Total | 92 | 60 | 152 | 15 | 137 | 152 | 99 | 53 | 152 |
| % | 95% CI | % | 95% CI | % | 95% CI | ||||
| Sensitivity | 64.3 | 51.9–75.4 | 95.7 | 88.0–99.1 | 47.1 | 35.1–59.4 | |||
| Specificity | 81.7 | 71.6–89.3 | 14.6 | 7.8–24.1 | 75.6 | 64.9–84.4 | |||
| Positive predictive value | 75.0 | 62.1–85.3 | 48.9 | 40.3–57.6 | 62.3 | 47.9–75.2 | |||
| Negative predictive value | 72.8 | 62.5 81.6 | 80.0 | 51.9–95.7 | 62.6 | 52.3–72.1 | |||
| Accuracy | 73.7 | 66.7–80.7 | 52.0 | 44.1–59.9 | 62.5 | 54.8–70.2 | |||
| к | 0.89 | 0.53 | 0.62 | ||||||
Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST), Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) and Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS-2002) versus Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) criteria. CI, confidence interval; к statistic, percent of agreement.