Table 2.
Assessment of the quality of the non-radomized controlled trial (RCT) studies using the Newcastle–Ottawa scale for case-control studies.
Selection | Comparability | Exposure | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Reference | CDA | RC | SC | DC | CCC | AE | SMA | NRR | Score |
Kondo et al. [24] | ☆ | ☆ | ☆☆ | ☆ | ☆ | 6 | |||
Fajkovic et al. [22] | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆☆ | ☆ | ☆ | 7 | ||
Kobayashi et al. [25] | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆☆ | ☆ | ☆ | 7 | ||
Chappidi et al. [10] | ☆ | ☆ | ☆☆ | ☆ | ☆ | 6 | |||
Zareba et al. [26] | ☆ | ☆ | ☆☆ | ☆ | ☆ | 6 | |||
Winer et al. [23] | ☆ | ☆ | ☆☆ | ☆ | ☆ | 6 |
CDA: case definition adequate; RC: representativeness of the cases; SC: selection of controls; DC: definition of controls; CCC: comparability of cases and controls on the basis of the design or analysis; AE: ascertainment of exposure; SMA: same method of ascertainment for the cases and controls; NRR: non-response rate; A study can be awarded a maximum of one star (☆) for each numbered item within the selection and exposure categories. A maximum of two stars can be given for comparability.