Table 3.
Correlates of “Successful” Referral for Community Linkage to Care Program From December 1, 2017, to November 30, 2018 (N = 287).
| Successful, n (%) | Unsuccessful, n (%) | Unadjusted Analyses |
Adjusted Analysesa |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Odds Ratio | 95% CI | P | Odds Ratio | 95% CI | P | |||
| Total | 124 (43) | 163 (57) | ||||||
| Child sex | ||||||||
| Male | 66 (46) | 77 (54) | Ref | |||||
| Female | 58 (40) | 86 (60) | 0.77 | 0.49-1.26 | .32 | |||
| Child age | ||||||||
| <4 years | 50 (48) | 55 (52) | Ref | Ref | ||||
| ≥4 years | 74 (41) | 108 (59) | 0.75 | 0.46- 1.22 | .25 | 0.72 | 0.44-1.19 | .20 |
| Preferred spoken language | ||||||||
| English | 88 (40) | 131 (60) | Ref | Ref | ||||
| Spanish | 34 (53) | 30 (47) | 1.69 | 0.96-2.95 | .07 | 1.68 | 0.94- 2.99 | .08 |
| Outreach attempts, n | ||||||||
| 1-3 | 91 (41) | 132 (59) | Ref | Ref | ||||
| ≥4 | 33 (52) | 31 (48) | 1.5 | 0.88-2.70 | .13 | 1.92 | 1.06-3.49 | .03 |
| Follow-up time, days | ||||||||
| <30 | 49 (54) | 41 (46) | Ref | Ref | ||||
| ≥30 | 75 (38) | 122 (62) | 0.51 | 0.31-0.85 | .01 | 0.43 | 0.25-0.73 | .002 |
| Initial encounter method, n | ||||||||
| In-person (warm hand-off) | 9 (50) | 9 (50) | Ref | |||||
| Phone | 115 (43) | 154 (57) | 0.75 | 0.29-1.94 | .55 | |||
| Social needs identified, n | ||||||||
| 1 | 73 (44) | 93 (56) | Ref | |||||
| 2-3 | 40 (41) | 57 (59) | 0.89 | 0.54-1.50 | .67 | |||
| ≥4 | 11 (46) | 13 (54) | 1.08 | 0.46-2.54 | .86 | |||
Abbreviations: n, total number; CI, confidence interval; Ref, reference group.
a
Model adjusts for child age, preferred spoken language, outreach attempts, and follow-up time included based on backward stepwise regression.