Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 4;26:e922879-1–e922879-11. doi: 10.12659/MSM.922879

Table 3.

Blood loss, blood product use and procoagulant interventions among the control and case group patients.

EBL (mL) EBL (>500) RBC1 FFP Cryo PLT Any BLP PCC TXA
All controls (n=65) 400 (300–500) 10 (15.4) 10 (15.4) 11 (16.9) 2 (3.1) 7 (10.8) 23 (35.4) 1 (1.5) 25 (38.5)
 Control-N (n=39) 400 (300–500) 5 (12.8) 5 (12.8) 4 (10.3) 0 (0) 0 (0)* 6 (15.4)* 0 (0) 15 (38.5)
 Control-CP (n=26) 400 (300–500) 5 (19.2) 5 (19.2) 7 (26.9) 2 (7.7) 7 (26.9)* 17 (65.4)* 1 (3.8) 10 (38.5)
All cases (n=69) 400 (300–500) 15 (21.7) 13 (18.8) 9 (13) 7 (10.1) 8 (11.6) 24 (34.8) 61 (1.4) 25 (36.2)
 Case-N (n=35) 400 (300–500) 6 (17.1) 5 (14.3) 1 (2.9)* 1 (2.9)* 0 (0)* 4 (11.4)* 0 (0) 7 (20.0)*
 Case-CP (n=34) 400 (300–600) 9 (26.5) 8 (23.5) 8 (23.5)* 6 (17.6)* 8 (23.5)* 20 (58.8)* 1 (2.9) 18 (52.9)*
1

RBC’s were transfused if hemoglobin was <90 g/L.

*

Statistically significant differences between normal versus coagulopathic patient subgroups within controls and cases, P<0.05.

Continuous variables are reported as median (interquartile range). Categorical variables are reported in terms of frequency (percentage). N – normal; CP – coagulopathic; EBL – estimated blood loss; RBC – red blood cells; FFP – fresh frozen plasma; Cryo – cryoprecipitate; PLT – platelets; PCC – prothrombin complex concentrate, TXA – tranexamic acid; BLP – blood product.