Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 20;75(8):1473–1480. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glaa022

Table 1.

Influence of Sympathetic Stimulation on Spontaneous and Evoked Synaptic Potentials in Young and Geriatric Mice

Mice N Mice N Fibers MEPP Frequency MEPP Amplitude EPP Amplitude Prestimulation EPP Amplitude Poststimulation p Value (PRE vs POST) QC Prestimulation QC Poststimulation p value (pre vs post)
Young 6 26 (EPP) 43 (MEPP) 7.822 (0.673) 0.770 (0.013) 30.8 (1.7) 30.9 (1.7) .968 39.3 (3.2) 38.2 (3.3) .816
Geriatric 5 20 (EPP) 20 (MEPP) 9.180§ (1.480) 0.855§§ (0.032) 22.5* (1.58) 22.7** (1.68) .933 29.2# (2.06) 29.5## (2.2) .967

Note: QC = Quantal content. SEM is between parentheses. The number of fibers ranged from 4 to 6 per mouse.

§MEPP frequency in young versus geriatric mice, p = .398. §§MEPP amplitude in young versus geriatric mice, p = .027. * Prestimulation EPP amplitude in young versus geriatric mice, p = .001; **Poststimulation EPP amplitude in geriatric versus young mice, p = .002; #Prestimulation QC in geriatric versus young mice, p = .014; ##Poststimulation QC in geriatric versus young mice, p = .087.