Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul;41(7):1302–1308. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A6601

Table 3:

Clusters that showed significant differences (P  ≤  .05, corrected) in group comparisons of cortical thickness or surface areaa

Cluster No. Size (mm2) No. of Vertices Peak Coordinate
Peak Vertex t Value Cluster-Wise P Value Relationships
x y z
1 106 134 9.9 –87.1 17.7 5.05 .007 All: MF>BF
2 132 165 10.7 –87.4 18.5 5.38 .003 Boys: MF>BF
3 128 180 –11.4 –74 12.7 5.34 .004 Boys: MF>BF
4 151 189 11.2 –87.8 18.5 4.76 .001 Boys: MF>SF
5 78 100 3.6 –74.2 14.3 4.88 .02 Boys: MF>SF
6 87 82 –7.8 –87.9 –10.8 4.65 .01 Boys: MF>SF
7 53 117 15.2 –16 64.5 4.38 .046 Girls: SF>MF
8 138 220 –32.9 8.5 55.3 4.77 .01 Boys: MF>SFa
a

For surface area comparison; everything else: for cortical thickness comparison.