Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 2;1:1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.crphys.2019.10.001

Table 3.

Conscious electrocardiography before and after 2-week TAC in C57BL/6J and C57BL/6N mice.

C57BL/6J
C57BL/6N
P (BL/6J vs. BL/6N TAC)
Sham 2-week TAC P Sham 2-week TAC P
N number 11 6 7 9
Heart rate, bpm 748 ± 12 759 ± 8 NS 735 ± 15 764 ± 12 NS NS
RR interval, ms 80.3 ± 1.3 79.1 ± 0.8 NS 81.6 ± 1.7 78.7 ± 1.2 NS NS
PR interval, ms 32.3 ± 0.7 33.0 ± 0.7 NS 31.5 ± 0.9 31.3 ± 1.2 NS NS
P duration, ms 7.77 ± 0.60 8.95 ± 0.63 NS 6.45 ± 0.31 9.26 ± 0.33 0.000 NS
QRS interval, ms 10.4 ± 0.5 16.0 ± 0.5 0.000 12.2 ± 0.4 19.4 ± 1.3 0.000 0.009
QT interval, ms 22.9 ± 2.0 30.4 ± 0.7 0.006 24.8 ± 0.7 34.6 ± 1.8 0.000 0.045
QTc, ms 81.2 ± 7.2 108.0 ± 2.9 0.003 85.1 ± 2.2 124.3 ± 6.4 0.000 0.036
JT interval, ms 12.6 ± 1.5 14.4 ± 0.5 NS 12.7 ± 0.5 15.5 ± 0.9 0.038 NS

Measurements are represented as mean ± SE and compared with 2-tailed Student's t-test. TAC, transverse aortic constriction; NS, not significant.