Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 29;9:e56223. doi: 10.7554/eLife.56223

Table 2. Comparison of TcMAC21 and other mouse models of DS.

Issues TcMAC21 Tc1 Ts65Dn Ts1Cje Dp(16)1Yey/+ or Dp1Tyb Dp(10)1Yey/+; Dp(16)1Yey/+; Dp(17)1Yey/+
Mosaicism No Yes No No No No
Freely segregating chromosome Yes Yes Yes No No No
Trisomic HSA21q PCG/orthologs
(% of 213 HSA21q)
199
(93.4%)
158
(74.2%)
110
(51.6%)
68
(31.9%)
122
(57.3%)
180 (40;122;18)
(84.5%)
Trisomic HSA21q PCG/orthologs, excluding KRTAPs 150 109 92 68 104 160
* Trisomic mouse PCGs with no human ortholog 0 0 7 7 10 12
† Trisomic or monosomic PCGs that are not HSA21 orthologs 0 0 Trisomic
~44 MMU17
Monosomic ~ 7
MMU12
0 0

*Refer to data file S1A for the name and location of each mouse PCG conserved with Hsa21 (MMU10, 16, 17). Gene annotation is based on ‘GRCh38, P12’ and ‘GRCm.P6’.

†The reference of the translocation breakpoints of Ts65Dn and Ts1Cje is “Duchon A, Raveau M, Chevalier C, Nalesso V, Sharp AJ, Herault Y. Identification of the translocation breakpoints in the Ts65Dn and Ts1Cje mouse lines: relevance for modeling Down syndrome. Mamm Genome. 2011;22(11, 12):674–684.’ The number of genes is based on ‘GRCm.P6’.