Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Aging Ment Health. 2020 Jan 14;25(5):844–855. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2020.1711863

Appendix B Table 3.

Global Fit Indices from Confirmatory Factor Analyses Assessing Factor Structure of Affect

Affect Factors χ2 χ2/df CFI TLI RMSEA AIC BIC
NA 1 WP / 1 BP 2638.90*** 263.89 0.16 −0.67 0.19 239446.91 239618.48
2 WP / 1 BP 310.78*** 34.53 0.90 0.79 0.07 236862.17 237040.60
1 WP / 2 BP 1373.61*** 152.62 0.57 0.04 0.15 239174.64 239353.07
2 WP / 2 BP 63.00*** 7.88 0.98 0.96 0.03 236596.30 236781.59
PA 1 WP / 1 BP 101.16*** 10.12 0.98 0.95 0.04 230396.14 230567.71
2 WP / 1 BP 57.64*** 6.40 0.99 0.97 0.03 230294.27 230472.70
1 WP / 2 BP 96.73*** 10.75 0.98 0.95 0.04 230385.69 230564.12
2 WP / 2 BP 53.21*** 6.65 0.99 0.97 0.03 230284.64 230469.93
NA 2 WP / 2 BP
PA 2 WP / 2 BP		 304.41*** 5.25 0.98 0.97 0.03 463204.46 463629.95
NA 2 WP / 2 BP
PA 2 WP / 1 BP		 314.90*** 5.16 0.98 0.97 0.02 463211.08 463615.97
LRT Δχ2 (1) = 10.49, p < .05, ΔCFI = .001.

Note. WP=within-person. BP=between-person. NA=negative affect. PA=positive affect. LRT=likelihood ratio test. A likelihood ratio test comparing the PA 2 WP / 2 BP model with the PA 2 WP / 1 BP model revealed a significant difference in model fit reducing the between-person factor structure to 1, Δχ2 (1) = 4.44, p < .05, ΔCFI < .001.