Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 14;118:102667. doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2020.102667

Table 3.

Input for the schematic map example of Fig. 3.

(a) Notations used for the example
WPi = Walk path i BLi = Bus line i BSi = Bus stop i
MSi = Metro stop i M = Metro (…) = Element in the parenthesis is a PT transfer point
(b) Routing data
Option Routing Total fare ($)* Travel time (min)** Comfort level***
1 WPA1 - MS1 - M - (MS2/BS2) - BL16 – BS3 - WPA3 12 70 3
2 WPA2 - BS1 - BL12 – BS5 -WPA4 8 96 4
3 WPA2 - BS1 - BL12 - (BS4) - BL18 10 75 4
4 WPA2 - BS1 -BL12 - (BS2) - BL16 – BS3- WPA3 15 105 2
(c) Passenger’s preferences and weights (all weights sum up to 1.0)
Preference Passenger A
Passenger B
Attribute Weight Attribute Weight
Most important Fare related 0.60 Time related 0.60
Moderately important Time related 0.30 Comfort related 0.30
Least important Comfort related 0.10 Fare related 0.10
(d) Passenger’s preference and input of JND threshold (by percentage) and max/min acceptable values
Preference Passenger A
Attribute βmJND βmJNDminl¯Lodvl¯,qod Acceptable valueηmaccept
Most important Fare related 10% $0.8 $15
Moderately important Time related 30% 21.0 min 120 min
Least important Comfort related 40% 0.8 1

Preference
Passenger B

Attribute
βmJND
βmJNDminl¯Lodvl¯,qod
Acceptable valueηmaccept

Most important Time related 10% 7.0 min 100 min
Moderately important Comfort related 20% 0.4 3
Least important Fare related 30% $2.4 $20
*

of all fare related attributes;

**

of all time-related attributes;

***

of all comfort-related attributes.