Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 7;7:115. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2020.00115

Table 6.

LRA1–LRA5 classification models.

Model Logit of model z = β01x12x2+…+βixi OR (95% CI) Z p
LRA1 (Phe) −2.6068 + 0.0029·Phe 1.0032 (1.0021–1.0046) 5.517 3.45e-08*
LRA 2 (Phe, Tyr) −0.5046 + 0.0025·Phe – 0.0207·Tyr Phe = 1.0025 (1.0016–1.0037),
Tyr = 0.9751 (0.9593–0.9881)
4.269
−3.042
1.96e-05*
0.0024*
LRA 3 (Met/Phe, Phe, Tyr) 0.7722 – 13.2300·Met/Phe + 0.0010·Phe – 0.0090·Tyr Met/Phe = 1.79e-06 (4.19e-11–0.009) −2.720 0.0065*
LRA4 (Met/Phe) 1.2661 – 21.4822·Met/Phe 3.76e-10 (8.33e-14–3.58e-07) −5.485 4.13e-08*
LRA5 (Met, Phe, C4, Ala, Eu × Tyr, C16:1) 0.7997 + 1.282e-03·Ala – 7.329e-02·Met + 2.877e-03·Phe – 4.531·C4 −6.102·C16:1 −7.559e-06·Eu × Tyr Ala = 1.0010 (9.97e-01–1.0037),
Met = 0.9286 (0.8750–0.9797),
Phe = 1.0028 (1.0017–1.0040),
C4 = 0.0069 (1.38e-05–0.5384),
C16:1 = 0.0097 (1.96e-07–42.85),
Eu × Tyr = 1.0000 (0.9999–1.00001)
0.602
−2.393
4.424
−1.819
−0.953
−0.266
0.5474
0.0167*
9.7e-06*
0.0689
0.3405
0.7899
*

p < 0.05 were selected.