Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 7;14:531. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2020.00531

TABLE 3.

Influence of day–night variation and sex on the behavioral traits.

Trait Sex-collapsed data
Sex-separated data
Sex effect
Time Population means
Day–night effect
Sex Time Population means
Day–night effect
Mean ± SD n p D Mean ± SD n p D p-value f
Feeding (g) Day 1.00.78 649 3.5E-188 1.42 Female Day 1.020.76 329 1.5E-87 1.37 0.027 0.09
Night 2.731.18
Night 2.831.24 Male Day 1.000.80 320 2.0E-101 1.49
Night 2.931.30
Drinking (ml) Day 1.00.83 648 9.9E-196 1.31 Female Day 1.040.84 325 1.8E-93 1.30 0.95
Night 2.991.52
Night 3.021.55 Male Day 0.930.81 323 9.1E-104 1.33
Night 3.051.58
Fine Day 14.414.69 666 5.4E-239 1.57 Female Day 14.874.97 333 1.2E-108 1.61 0.053
movements Night 26.616.88
(subsequent Night 26.056.93 Male Day 13.964.36 333 3.4E-97 1.53
beam breaks) Night 25.486.95
Ambulatory Day 23.5311.71 665 3.9E-205 1.29 Female Day 25.0812.95 333 1.2E-108 1.35 4.9E-7 0.21
movements Night 53.5622.96
(consecutive Night 50.0721.86 Male Day 21.9710.11 332 3.4E-97 1.25
beam breaks) Night 46.5720.13
Rearing Day 3.102.68 652 2.8E-172 1.26 Female Day 3.493.12 327 2.6E-85 1.29 1.3E-10 0.27
(Z-axis beam Night 8.994.51
breaks) Night 8.274.29 Male Day 2.702.08 325 1.1E-89 1.25
Night 7.543.94
RER (V CO2/ Day 0.800.08 663 4.1E-180 1.45 Female Day 0.800.08 334 1.7E-87 1.42 0.45
V O2) Night 0.890.08
Night 0.880.08 Male Day 0.790.08 329 3.0E-94 1.48
Night 0.880.08
Energy Day 0.400.02 658 3.5E-209 1.65 Female Day 0.400.003 332 5.1E-100 1.65 0.13
expenditure Night 0.470.004
(kcal/h)* Night 0.470.02 Male Day 0.390.003 326 2.3E-110 1.66
Night 0.470.004
Cage Day 21.870.56 671 8.2E-43 0.54 Female Day 21.920.53 337 2.6E-20 0.49 0.00029 0.15
temperature Night 21.850.51
(°C) Night 21.790.53 Male Day 21.820.58 334 2.9E-24 0.59
Nnight 21.730.55
Body weight (g) Female 23.636.94 337 2.2E-101 1.06
Male 28.257.06 334

Day–night variation on the behavioral traits are given as diurnal and nocturnal population means for pooled sexes (left columns) and separate sexes (middle columns) across 30 strains. The comparisons follow RM-ANCOVA (as in Table 2). The effect sizes for repeated measures are reported as Cohen’s D [very small D ≥ 0.01; small D ≥ 0.2; medium D ≥ 0.5; large D ≥ 0.8; very large D ≥ 1.2 (Sawilowsky, 2009)] and for sex as f as calculated from the respective partial Eta squared (large effects > 0.4, medium effects > 0.25, and small effects > 0.1). “n,” sample size; “p,” p-value; “D,” effect size; outlier analysis was performed for each strain and sex. Body weight was analyzed using univariate ANOVA. *EE was modeled by ANCOVA with bodyweight and age as covariates and the estimated marginal means are displayed.