Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 10;6(7):e04302. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04302

Table 4.

Amount of microplastics (# Mp/m3) found in water at studied sites compared with other rivers worldwide.

River/Point # Mp/m3 in water Drainage Area (Km2) Habitants Amount of Mp/m3 in water after presence of WWTP Country
Guayllabamba/M5 1584.23 2578.2 2205901 - Ecuador
San Pedro/SP2 168.12 1405.5 126910 - Ecuador
Pita/SP3 30.18 1338.2 67121 - Ecuador
San Pedro/SP7 2.23 209 42399 - Ecuador
Pita/3.2PI 0.73 58.5 17930 - Ecuador
Higgen's Cr. 0.57 168.863 2640003 11.22 USA1
Springbrook Cr. 1.17 173.52 63000 5.39 USA
L Kickapoo Cr. 1.24 NF NF 0.80 USA
N. Shore Ch. 3.36 67.97 45000 6.60 USA
Goose Cr. 4,37 370.36 1300000 2.53 USA
DuPage R. 5.92 NF NF 10.28 USA
W Br DuPage R. 0.93 NF 24000 2.96 USA
Salt Cr. 0.48 NF NF 3.73 USA
E Br DuPage R. 3.14 NF NF 8.86 USA
Rin River (Duisburg) NF 232.8 499845 8.84 Germany2
Rin River (Rees) NF 109,7 22267 11.05 Germany

Note: The values in blank “-” mean that within Ecuador the points studied do not have Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP), while the values with "NF" mean that the information were not found.

1

The values in USA come from McCormick et al. (2016).

2

The values in Germany come from Mani et al. (2015).

3

The values for habitants and drainage area in other river worldwide come from each wastewater system official site.