Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 12;8(1):e001273. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2020-001273

Table 3.

Trends in the association of total diabetes prevalence with demographic and cardiovascular risk factors, Bus Santé Study, 2005–2017

2005–2010 2011–2014 2015–2017 P trend†
OR (95% CI)* OR (95% CI)* OR (95% CI)*
Age group
 18–44 1.00 (ref) 1.00 (ref) 1.00 (ref)
 45–64 2.00 (1.28 to 3.14) 2.04 (1.32 to 3.14) 1.98 (1.28 to 3.07) 0.26
 65+ 2.62 (1.57 to 4.36) 2.79 (1.71 to 4.56) 3.70 (2.28 to 6.00) 0.02
Gender
 Women 1.00 (ref) 1.00 (ref) 1.00 (ref)
 Men 1.52 (1.10 to 2.11) 1.41 (1.03 to 1.94) 1.24 (0.89 to 1.73) 0.14
Body mass index (kg/m2)
 18.5–24.9 1.00 (ref) 1.00 (ref) 1.00 (ref)
 25–29.9 1.62 (1.09 to 2.41) 1.76 (1.21 to 2.55) 1.67 (1.13 to 2.48) 0.40
 ≥30 4.43 (2.91 to 6.74) 3.89 (2.61 to 5.80) 4.35 (2.85 to 6.64) 0.09
Hypertension
 No 1.00 (ref) 1.00 (ref) 1.00 (ref)
 Yes 2.16 (1.53 to 3.05) 1.40 (1.01 to 1.95) 1.64 (1.17 to 2.30) 0.15
Hypercholesterolemia
 No 1.00 (ref) 1.00 (ref) 1.00 (ref)
 Yes 1.30 (0.94 to 1.79) 2.19 (1.56 to 3.07) 1.72 (1.23 to 2.41) 0.83

*ORs and 95% CIs are from logistic regression models stratified by survey period, adjusted for all covariates in table plus educational level, household income, health insurance subsidy, and year of survey. Estimates in bold represent difference from reference group at p<0.05.

†P value for linear trend from logistic regression with interaction term between each predictor variable as binary or categorical and survey period as continuous variable.