Table 1.
Characteristics of included studies in the meta-analysis
| Author, year/quality of evidence | Design | Country | Setting | Population | WASH alone and/or combined with nutrition | Outcome | Effect size | |
| MD | 95% CI | |||||||
| Arnold et al, 2010 Quality: very low25 |
Non-RCT | India | Rural | Children <5 years | Water supply and improvements+sanitation and hygiene behaviour change | HAZ | −0.04 | −0.35 to 0.30 |
| WAZ | −0.05 | −0.26 to 0.18 | ||||||
| WHZ | −0.10 | −0.19 to 0.10 | ||||||
| Arnold et al, 2009 Quality: very low42 |
Non-RCT | Guatemala | Rural | Children <5 years | Water boiling, water solar disinfection and chlorination using dilute beach+handwashing promotions using soap or detergent and scrubbing | HAZ | 0.04 | −0.31 to 0.33 |
| WAZ | −0.05 | −0.33 to 0.21 | ||||||
| WHZ | −0.07 | −0.25 to 0.12 | ||||||
| Bowen et al, 2012 Quality: low30 |
RCT | Pakistan | Rural | Children <5 years | Handwashing promotion with soap flocculent-disinfectant and sodium hypochlorite solution for drinking water treatment | HAZ | 0.08 | −0.29 to 0.27 |
| WAZ | −0.06 | −0.27 to 0.17 | ||||||
| Briceño et al, 2015 Quality: low29 |
RCT | Tanzania | Rural | Children <5 years | Total sanitation and sanitation marketing+handwashing with soap | HAZ | −0.01 | −0.12 to 0.10 |
| WAZ | −0.08 | −0.15 to 0.00 | ||||||
| Cameron et al, 2013 Quality: medium26 |
RCT | Indonesia | Rural | Children <5 years | Total sanitation and sanitation marketing (community-led total sanitation+sanitation marketing+enabling environment) | HAZ | 0.01 | −0.01 to 0.03 |
| WAZ | 0.03 | −0.09 to 0.15 | ||||||
| WHZ | 0.06 | −0.06 to 0.18 | ||||||
| Clasen et al, 2014 Quality: good27 |
RCT | India | Rural | Children <5 years | Latrine promotion and construction which combines social mobilisation with post hoc subsidy | HAZ | −0.01 | −0.22 to 0.02 |
| WAZ | 0.02 | −0.04 to 0.08 | ||||||
| Du Preez et al, 2011 Quality: medium33 |
RCT | Kenya | Pre-urban and rural | Children<5 years | Water disinfection using solar disinfection and chlorination | HAZ | 0.11 | −0.19 to 0.41 |
| WAZ | −0.01 | −0.23 to 0.21 | ||||||
| WHZ | −0.11 | −0.30 to 0.08 | ||||||
| Fenn et al, 2012 Quality: low43 |
Non-RCT | Ethiopia | Rural | Children <5 years | Hygiene educational, free drug provision, free primary healthcare services, material provisions for pit latrines and safe water sources construction. | HAZ | 0.33 | 0.08 to 0.59 |
| Galiani et al, 2012 Quality: very low28 |
RCT | Peru | Rural | Children <2 years | Handwashing promotion using mass media plus direct consumer contact | HAZ | −0.02 | −0.24 to 0.19 |
| WAZ | −0.01 | −0.23 to 0.20 | ||||||
| WHZ | 0.06 | −0.11 to 0.22 | ||||||
| Humphrey et al, 2019 Quality: good37 |
RCT | Zimbabwe | Rural | Pregnant women | Behaviour change modules delivery, standard of care messages, information dissemination on WASH and child feeding, latrine construction+handwashing stations+monthly supply of soap and chlorine+child feeding nutrient-rich foods+lipid-based nutrient | HAZ | 0.06 | −0.01 to 0.12 |
| WAZ | 0.00 | −0.06 to 0.06 | ||||||
| WHZ | −0.04 | −0.11 to 0.03 | ||||||
| Langford et al, 2011 Quality: very low31 |
Non-RCT | Nepal | Urban Slum | Children 3–12 months | Handwashing promotion | HAZ | −0.26 | −0.66 to 0.13 |
| WAZ | −0.19 | −0.62 to 0.23 | ||||||
| WHZ | 0.09 | −0.23 to 0.42 | ||||||
| Lin et al, 2013 Quality: very low39 |
non-RCT | Bangladesh | Rural | Children <4 years | Education on water, sanitation and handwashing | HAZ | 0.54 | 0.06 to 1.01 |
| WAZ | 0.04 | −0.48 to 0.55 | ||||||
| WHZ | −0.19 | −0.61 to 0.24 | ||||||
| Luby et al, 2018 Quality: good40 |
RCT | Bangladesh | Rural | Pregnancy in first two trimester and children <3 years | Individual water, sanitation and hygiene and combined WASH and WASH+nutrition | HAZ | 0.02 | −0.09 to 0.19 |
| 0.13 | 0.02 to 0.24* | |||||||
| WAZ | 0.00 | −0.09 to 0.10 | ||||||
| 0.13 | 0.04 to 0.22* | |||||||
| WHZ | 0.00 | −0.10 to 0.11 | ||||||
| 0.09 | 0.00 to 0.18* | |||||||
| Muhoozi et al, 2017 Quality: medium32 |
RCT | Uganda | Rural | Children 20–24 months | Combined nutrition with simulation, sanitation and hygiene education | HAZ | 0.10 | −0.17 to 0.36* |
| WAZ | 0.01 | −0.27 to 0.29* | ||||||
| WHZ | −0.05 | −0.33 to 0.22* | ||||||
| Nair et al, 2017 Quality: medium36 |
RCT | India | Rural | Pregnancy in third trimester and children <2 years | Counselling on maternal nutrition, growth promotion for children through young child feeding, illness prevention, education on water, sanitation and hygiene | HAZ | 0.11 | −0.01 to 0.23* |
| WAZ | 0.07 | −0.02 to 0.16* | ||||||
| WHZ | 0.02 | −0.08 to 0.11* | ||||||
| Null et al, 2018 Quality: good41 |
RCT | Kenya | Rural | Women in second or third trimester and children 6–24 months | Individual water, sanitation and hygiene or combined WASH intervention and combined with nutrition | HAZ | −0.03 | −0.14 to 0.08 |
| 0.16 | 0.05 to 0.27* | |||||||
| WAZ | −0.02 | −0.12 to 0.08 | ||||||
| 0.14 | 0.04 to 0.25* | |||||||
| WHZ | −0.02 | −0.10 to 0.07 | ||||||
| 0.09 | 0.00 to 0.19* | |||||||
| Patil et al, 2014 Quality: medium38 |
RCT | India | Rural | Children <5 years | Total sanitation campaign | HAZ | −0.04 | −0.22 to 0.14 |
| WAZ | −0.09 | −0.25 to 0.06 | ||||||
| WHZ | 0.03 | −0.14 to 0.20 | ||||||
| Pickering et al, 2015 Quality: medium35 |
RCT | Mali | Rural | Children <5 years | Community-led total sanitation | HAZ | 0.24 | 0.09 to 0.40 |
| WAZ | 0.16 | 0.01 to 0.31 | ||||||
*Results of WASH+nutrition.
HAZ, Height-for-age z-score; I, Intervention; MD, mean difference; non-RCT, an experimental study comparing an intervention and control group, where the allocation method was not random; RCT, randomised controlled trial; WASH, water, sanitation and hygiene; WAZ, weight-for-age z-score; WHZ, weight-for-height z-score.