Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 12;10(7):e034812. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034812

Table 3.

Results of meta-regression analyses of mean difference in child growth on quality scores items of the included studies

Categories Items in quality score (moderators) Regression coefficient (95% CI) SE P value
Overall quality Intercept 0.01 (−0.88 to 0.91) 0.466 0.975
General domain vs total score 0.01 (−0.02 to 0.04) 0.017 0.571
Risk of bias vs total score −0.01 (−0.02 to 0.00) 0.006 0.154
Total score Reference
Risk of bias Intercept 0.68 (−0.08 to 1.43) 0.384 0.078
Sequence generation −0.01 (−0.05 to 0.03) 0.020 0.502
Allocation concealment 0.03 (−0.02 to 0.08) 0.024 0.229
Was baseline outcome similar? 0.06 (0.02 to 0.10) 0.021 0.007
Were baseline characteristics similar? −0.13 (−0.23 to −0.03) 0.051 0.009
Incomplete outcome data addressed 0.03 (−0.04 to 0.09) 0.033 0.412
Blinding of participants 0.03 (−0.03 to 0.08) 0.029 0.350
Blinding of outcome assessment 0.01 (−0.04 to 0.06) 0.024 0.756
Was there selective reporting bias? −0.02 (−0.06 to 0.03) 0.024 0.494
Protection against contamination 0.02 (−0.03 to 0.06) 0.023 0.474
Adequately adjusted for confounders? −0.03 (−0.10 to 0.04) 0.0345 0.345
Total score of risk of bias Reference